universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

303Table 0-Erro! Apenas o documento principal. - Questions on the role of review editorsQuestions1. What are the review editor’s duties and aims?2. Describe the process of actually determining who is going to review what, i.e., finding the right reviewerfor a given book. In your opinion, is the reviewer a specialist?3. How much time does it take to be an editor: worst and best of it?4. How many reviews do you get to publish each issue? How many do you reject?5. Could you point out some characteristics of a good book in your discipline?Table 0-Erro! Apenas o documento principal. - Questions on text content andorganization of book reviewsQuestions1. What kind of review could be considered as a standard one of your journal, i.e., more representative of what areview should be?2. What is the central information in reviews?3. How much evaluative language can or ought to be used? How much hedging is desirable?4. Do you think reviews ought to be more evaluative or more descriptive?5. How do you see entirely positive/negative reviews?6. What is the appropriate review length for your journal? What factors determine length (e.g., disciplinaryconstraints, journal policy, editor’s personal opinion? Do you think that the longer the review, the more thereviewer is using it to write his opinions on the book so as to appear more?7. Do you see any differences in reviewing first vs. second (or further) editions of a volume; or reviewingproceedings vs. reference book?8. What kind of information do members of your discipline look for when they read reviews? Why do you personallyread reviews?Table 0-Erro! Apenas o documento principal.- Size of the corpus in number of wordsField #1-#20 #21-#40 #41-#60 Total Average lengthChem 11,824 10,538 11,057 33,419 557Ling 22,305 27,701 32,411 82,417 1,374Eco 21,796 17,794 18,938 58,528 975174,364 969
304Table 0-Erro! Apenas o documento principal.- References of the texts in thechemistry corpusTextReferenceCASSIDY, Patrick E. 1990. Review of ‘Polymer materials: An introduction for technologists and scientists’ by Christopher Hall.C#1 Jo urnal of theAmerican Chemical Society , 1 12 (1):467C# 2 DILL, Ken A. 1990. Review of ‘Lipid and biopolymer monolayers at liquid interfaces’ by K. S. Birdi . Jo urnal of the American ChemicalSociety , 1 12 (3):1299C#3 KLABUNDE, Kenneth J. 1990. Review of ‘Electrons in metals and alloys’ by J. A. Alonso. Jo urnal of theAmerican Chemical Society , 1 12 (4):16 64C# 4 JUVET , JR., Richard S . 1990. Review of ‘ Chromatographic separations. Analytical chemistry by o pen learning’ by P eterA. Sewell and Brian Clarke . Jo urnal of the American Chemical Society , 1 12 ( 10 ): 4 0 92C# 5 KELIHER, Peter N. 1990. Review of ‘Flow injection atomic spectroscopy. Practical Spectroscopy Series.Volume 7’ edited by Jose Luis Burguera. Jo urnal of the American Chemical Society , 1 12(6): 2468C#6 BUYNAK, John D. 1990. Review of ‘Heterosiloxanes Volume 1: Derivatives of non-biogenic elements.Soviet Scientific Reviews Supplement Series, Section B: Chemistry, Volume 2’ by M. G. Voronkov. Jo urnalof the American Chemical Society , 1 12 (8):3258COHEN, Claude. 1990. Review of ‘Rigid-chain polymers: Hydrodynamic and optical properties in solution’ by V. N. Tsvetkov.C#7Jo urnal of theAmerican Chemical Society , 1 12 (9):3718C#8 FRONTICELLI, Clara. 1990. Review of ‘Dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids’ by J. Andrew McCammon.Jo urnal of the American Chemical Society , 1 12 ( 10 ):4092C#9 LEFFEK, K. T. 1990. Review of ‘Advances in physical organic chemistry, volume 25’ edited by D. Bethell.Jo urnal of the American Chemical Society , 1 12 (13):5389C#10 SCHUG, John C. 1990. Review of ‘Second quantized approach to quantum chemistry: An elementaryintroduction’ by P. R. Surján. Jo urnal of the American Chemical Society , 1 12(15):5898GRUEHN, Reginald. 1990. Review of ‘Copper oxide superconductors’ by C. P. Poole, T. Datta and H. A. Farach. Angewandt Chemie, International Edition inC#11C#12English, 29(1):111-12HERRMANN, Günter. 1990. Review of ‘Vom Radiothor zur Uranspaltung. Eine wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie’ by O. Hahn. Angewandt Chemie,International Edition in English, 29(2):219-20Angewandt Chemie, InternationalC#13 LÜNING, Ulrich. 1990. Review of ‘Supramolekulare Chemie’ by F. Vogtle Teubner.Edition in English, 29 (3):323-24C#14 PAQUETTE, Leo A. 1990. Review of ‘Comprehensive organic transformations’ by R. C. Larock. AngewandtC#15Chemie, International Edition in English, 29 (3):435qKROHN, Karsten. 1990. Review of ‘Anthracycline- and Anthracenedione-based anticancer agents’ by J. W. Lown. Angewandt Chemie, International Edition inEnglish, 29(5):559-60Angewandt Chemie,C#16 JANOSCHEK, Rudolf. 1990. Review of ‘Schrödinger — Life and thought’ by W. Moore.International Edition in English, 29 (6):697-98C#17 FEIGEL, Martin. 1990. Review of ‘Conformational analysis of medium-sized heterocycles’ edited by R. S.Glass. Angewandt Chemie, International Edition in English, 29 (7):815C#18VO TH, Gregory A . 1990. Review of ‘M athematical methods in chemistry and physics’ by M . E. Starzak. Jo urnal of theAmerican Chemical Society , 1 12 ( 15 ): 5 8 99C#19 VAN DER MAAS. 1990. Review of ‘Raman/lnfrared atlas of organic compounds’ by B. Schrader. Recueildes Travaux Chimiques de Pays-Bas, 109(7-8):452C#20 VAN DER PUT, P. J. 1990. Review of ‘Boranes and metalloboranes. structure, bonding and reactivity’ byCatherine E. Housecroft. Recueil des Travaux Chimiques de Pays-Bas, 109(12):594C#21 BAUDLER, Marianne. 1990. Review of ‘Non-metal rings, cages and clusters’ by J. D. Woolinslens.Angewandt Chemie - International Edition in English, 29(1):110C#22 METZLER, Manfred. 1990. Review of ‘Nitrosamines. Toxicology and microbiology. (Ellis Horwood Seriesin Food Science and Technology)’ edited by M. J. Hill. Angewandt Chemie - International Edition inEnglish, 29(2): 220-21C#23 KLEIBÖHMER, Wolfgang. 1990. Review of ‘Modern Supercritical Fluid Chromatography’ edited by C. M.White. Angewandt Chemie - International Edition in English, 29(4):325-326
Page 2 and 3:
Esta tese foi julgada adequada e ap
Page 4 and 5:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSI would like to tha
Page 6 and 7:
RESUMORHETORICAL FEATURES AND DISCI
Page 8 and 9:
Notes..............................
Page 10 and 11:
6.2.1 Differences in length of move
Page 12 and 13:
LIST OF TABLESChapter 5Table 5-1- P
Page 14:
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATAR
Page 17 and 18:
2junior scholars (graduate students
Page 19 and 20:
4The assumption is that such a desc
Page 21 and 22:
6genre has been greatly neglected f
Page 23 and 24:
8genres as commonsensical truth, no
Page 25 and 26:
10to reflecting about how these tex
Page 27 and 28:
12Firstly, I will draw on topics re
Page 29 and 30:
14This study thus seeks to obtain a
Page 31 and 32:
16For the investigation of generic
Page 33 and 34:
18of the three selected academic di
Page 35 and 36:
20The controversy between those who
Page 37 and 38:
22correct sentences arranged in app
Page 39 and 40:
24ESL reading, learners that posses
Page 41 and 42:
26faculty audience’ (ibid.), i.e.
Page 43 and 44:
28In the remaining of the chapter,
Page 45 and 46:
30Jamieson is that, after the fall
Page 47 and 48:
32I found that I could not understa
Page 49 and 50:
34Further research in English (Wolf
Page 51 and 52:
362.2.3.1 The Generic Structure Pot
Page 53 and 54:
38Optional elements, on the other h
Page 55 and 56:
40This calibration of the contextua
Page 57 and 58:
42correspond to the above definitio
Page 59 and 60:
44of the genre. Typification of the
Page 61 and 62:
46_________________________________
Page 63 and 64:
48(ibid.) finds that certain lingui
Page 65 and 66:
50Step 3 - Indicating RA structure:
Page 67 and 68:
52Dudley-Evans acknowledges the pre
Page 69 and 70:
542.4.2 Evaluation in book reviewAs
Page 71 and 72:
56that of establishing the criteria
Page 73 and 74:
58pertaining to linguistic and disc
Page 75 and 76:
60‘evaluating’ starts). If, how
Page 77 and 78:
62there have been studies that have
Page 79 and 80:
64meaning only in terms of communic
Page 81 and 82:
66viii ‘The grammatical and/or le
Page 83 and 84:
68the discussion that follows becau
Page 85 and 86:
70two weeks, the linguistics editor
Page 87 and 88:
72to the journal. Less frequently,
Page 89 and 90:
74different perspectives on the rol
Page 91 and 92:
76Although their main role is to en
Page 93 and 94:
78Senior scholars in the field are
Page 95 and 96:
80manifestation of agreement (1), a
Page 97 and 98:
82[C]Most journals are expensive in
Page 99 and 100:
84In general, then, BRs have a far
Page 101 and 102:
86L, however, expects an in-depth a
Page 103 and 104:
88[E]We are published by the Americ
Page 105 and 106:
90to offer the reader his views on
Page 107 and 108:
923.2.7 Book review formatBook revi
Page 109 and 110:
94[E]We also identify some particul
Page 111 and 112:
96main technological and scientific
Page 113 and 114:
98We do encourage people to make ju
Page 115 and 116:
100According to the editors, bold o
Page 117 and 118:
102A second set of conclusions refe
Page 119 and 120:
104In the following chapter (Chapte
Page 121 and 122:
1064.1 The corpusThe corpus of the
Page 123 and 124:
108Probably because they are not th
Page 125 and 126:
110journals, five (5) economics jou
Page 127 and 128:
112out by the chemistry BR editor,
Page 129 and 130:
114was also evidenced in the report
Page 131 and 132:
116(ibid.:25) while in evaluative p
Page 133 and 134:
1184.2.3.2 Validity markers, attitu
Page 135 and 136:
120(i) Other readers -- given their
Page 137 and 138:
122If terms of praise and blame are
Page 139 and 140:
124Paradigms” (generalized commit
Page 141 and 142:
126Swales, 1986) that have emphasiz
Page 143 and 144:
128The intention here is to find ou
Page 145 and 146:
130CHAPTER 5TEXT ANALYSIS5.0 Introd
Page 147 and 148:
132The descriptive move, Outlining
Page 149 and 150:
134audience, authorship, disciplina
Page 151 and 152:
136The main portion of the BR is th
Page 153 and 154:
138in Moves 2 and 3, the reviewer w
Page 155 and 156:
140referenced reflects this. Nevert
Page 157 and 158:
142Figure 5-Erro! Apenas o document
Page 159 and 160:
144Closing: (Sub-function 10B) The
Page 161 and 162:
146the sentences have a clear discu
Page 163 and 164:
148Each one of the five sub-functio
Page 165 and 166:
150[L#4] Beginning with the assumpt
Page 167 and 168:
152[C#5] (Sub-function 2) This book
Page 169 and 170:
154(30%), the reviewers do this by
Page 171 and 172:
156[L#19] (Sub-function 4) In the 1
Page 173 and 174:
158(a) Stressing the role of this n
Page 175 and 176:
160[L#11] (Sub-function 5) Some of
Page 177 and 178:
162[C#15] (Sub-function 6) ...The t
Page 179 and 180:
164The idea of sequence in which th
Page 181 and 182:
166(i) Nouns that do not refer to t
Page 183 and 184:
168[C#5] (Sub-function 7) The first
Page 185 and 186:
170In [E#1], the four words tax, in
Page 187 and 188:
172Move 2 defines the overall organ
Page 189 and 190:
174In relation to the first shift,
Page 191 and 192:
176would do better to believe him w
Page 193 and 194:
178present discussion, i.e., the co
Page 195 and 196:
180(c) By pointing out criteria for
Page 197 and 198:
182[C#18] (Sub-function 9) There ar
Page 199 and 200:
184Most often, however, this variab
Page 201 and 202:
186[L#13] Inconclusion, I shouldlik
Page 203 and 204:
188appealing from a theoretical vie
Page 205 and 206:
190[C#4] (Sub-function 10B) ...it s
Page 207 and 208:
192longer genre such as the researc
Page 209 and 210:
194with less important details but
Page 211 and 212:
196for example, Sub-function 3, the
Page 213 and 214:
198(b) Explicit lexemes in the form
Page 215 and 216:
200will not appear in the concordan
Page 217 and 218:
202linguistic clues. A set of canon
Page 219 and 220:
204along the axis that links hard s
Page 221 and 222:
2061) Disciplinary activities organ
Page 223 and 224:
208implied by the words ‘rigor’
Page 225 and 226:
210problems and methods.’ The end
Page 227 and 228:
212considerably lower (58,528) than
Page 229 and 230:
214Table 6-2 shows examples randoml
Page 231 and 232:
216[E#6] The book is wellwritten, w
Page 233 and 234:
218evaluation for economics, and mo
Page 235 and 236:
220This type of function-dyad intro
Page 237 and 238:
222The analysis of BR introductions
Page 239 and 240:
224(Sub-functions 7A+9) Goodhart su
Page 241 and 242:
226(underlined in bold) or the seco
Page 243 and 244:
228In the discussion of text length
Page 245 and 246:
230to verify that reference to extr
Page 247 and 248:
232lexemes such as nouns (the autho
Page 249 and 250:
234Besides the evaluation in Move 3
Page 251 and 252:
236warrants and data to prove that
Page 253 and 254:
238another criterion by which to ev
Page 255 and 256:
240Citation of secondary sources wi
Page 257 and 258:
242that concepts are less disputed
Page 259 and 260:
244less experienced professionals
Page 261 and 262:
246Values are expressed by particul
Page 263 and 264:
248He points out that the author so
Page 265 and 266:
250Time is another important factor
Page 267 and 268: 252other things, Haas verified that
Page 269 and 270: 254‘meaningful’, ‘coherent’
Page 271 and 272: 256[C#1] This book surprisingly is
Page 273 and 274: 258While in economics, author and b
Page 275 and 276: 260suggested that each one of the t
Page 277 and 278: 262social science, probably as a wa
Page 279 and 280: 264Firstly, BR editors were intervi
Page 281 and 282: 2667.1.1 The productivity of the ge
Page 283 and 284: 268members at smaller universities
Page 285 and 286: 270Pays-Bas published in the Nether
Page 287 and 288: 272Thus, contributions are either s
Page 289 and 290: 274sub-functions was discussed in a
Page 291 and 292: 276the other two disciplines, indic
Page 293 and 294: 278readership. In addition, concept
Page 295 and 296: 280references are not seen as neces
Page 297 and 298: 282are for the most part equally un
Page 299 and 300: 284complementary phases: establishm
Page 301 and 302: 286One can always argue that, more
Page 303 and 304: 288field, in a concise text. BRs ar
Page 305 and 306: 290existence acknowledged by the sc
Page 307 and 308: 2923 Experimental studies on contra
Page 309 and 310: BIZZELL, P. 1982. College compositi
Page 311 and 312: FOUCAULT, M. 1973 [1966]. The order
Page 313 and 314: LABOV, W. and J. Waletzky. 1967. Na
Page 315 and 316: ROSALDO, R. 1987. Where objectivity
Page 317: 302WINTER, E. 1992. The notion of u
Page 321 and 322: 306C#50 FIELD, Lamar. 1990. Review
Page 323 and 324: 308E#43 GRINOLS, Earl l. 1990. Revi
Page 325 and 326: L#35 ROMAINE, Suzanne. 1990. ‘Pid
Page 327 and 328: 31213 Journal of Chemical Info. and
Page 329 and 330: 314Outlining: (Sub-function 6) The
Page 331 and 332: 31667816 80 14 70 10 50 40 66.6716
Page 333 and 334: 318Table 0-Erro! Apenas o documento
Page 341 and 342: 326Linguistics Chemistry Economics
Page 343 and 344: 328• unclear• makes very little
Page 345 and 346: 330• comprehensive• comprehensi
Page 347 and 348: 332• new• contemporary• origi
Page 349 and 350: 334• attractive [layout and print
Page 351 and 352: • • in a few places author buil
Page 353 and 354: 338• simple answers• complex is
Page 355 and 356: 340• sensitivity• integration o
show all

universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?