13.07.2015 Views

universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LABOV, W. and J. Waletzky. 1967. Narrative Analysis: oral versions of personalexperience. In J. Helm (ed.). Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Washington:University of Washington Press. pp. 12-44.LATOUR, B. and S. Woolgar. 1986 [1979]. Postscript to the Second Edition ofLaboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press. pp. 273-86.LEE, L. L. and E. Johnson. 1990. A directory of scholarly journals in English languageand literature. Troy, New York: The Whitston Publishing Co.LEECH, G. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.LEFF, M. C. 1987. Mo<strong>de</strong>rn sophistic and the unity of rhetoric. In J. S. Nelson, A.Megill, and D. N. McCloskey. The rhetoric of the human sciences. Madison, Wis:The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 19-37.LEKI, I. and J. G. Carson. 1994. Stu<strong>de</strong>nts’ perceptions of EAP writing instruction andwriting needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (1):81-101.LEVINSON, S. C. 1979. Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17: 365-99.LOI, M. Rigueur et ambiguite en math<strong>em</strong>atiques. In La pensée scientifique et sesdiscours. Actes du Colloque. Besançon: Centre <strong>de</strong> Linguistique Appliquée (CLAB).pp. 111-46.LOVE, A. 1993. Lexico-grammatical features of geology textbooks: process and productrevisited. English for Specific Purposes, 12:197-218.MARTIN, J. E. 1992. Towards a theory of text for contrastive rhetoric: An introductionto issues of text for stu<strong>de</strong>nts and practitioners of contrastive rhetoric. Americanuniversity studies. Series XIII, Linguistics, vol. 19. New York: Peter Lang.MAURANEN, A. 1993. Cultural differences in aca<strong>de</strong>mic discourse probl<strong>em</strong>s of alinguistic and cultural minority. In L. Loman, L. Kurkio-Suonio, S. Pellinen, and J.Lehtonen, (eds.). The competent intercultural communicator. A FinLa Yearbook1993. A FinLa Series, 51. Tampere: Finland.McCLOSKEY, D. N. 1985. The rhetoric of economics. Madison: The University ofWisconsin Press.__________. 1983. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature,21(2):481-517.MELANDER, B, J. M. Swales, and K. Fredrickson. (in press). Journal abstracts fromthree aca<strong>de</strong>mic fields in the United States and Swe<strong>de</strong>n: National or disciplinaryproclivities? In A. Duszak (ed.) Intellectual styles and cross-cultural communication.Amsterdam: Mouton <strong>de</strong> Gruyer.MESEROLE, H. T. and C. J. Bishop. 1970. Directory of journals and series in thehumanities. New York: Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Languages Association of America.MILLER, C. R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70: 151-67.MORRISON, A. et al. 1993. Teaching reading for subject areas. In G. M. Blue (ed.). pp.158-67.MOTTA-ROTH, D. 1995. Book reviews and disciplinary discourses: Defining a genre.Paper presented at the TESOL 29th Annual Convention & Exposition. Long Beach,CA, USA.298

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!