universidade federal de santa catarina pós-graduação em letras ...

180(c) By pointing out criteria for evaluation, through the use of explicit lexemes suchas ‘sufficient’, ‘enough’, ‘too’, ‘little’, ‘much’, ‘inadequate’,‘clear(ly)’, very oftenassociated with negation:[C#1] (Sub-function 9) There is sufficient mathematical treatment of eachappropriate topic to provide a good basis for understanding, but not so much asto overwhelm.[L#6] (Sub-function 9) Finally, in some instances, Tollefson does not distinguishclearly enough between policies and individuals, an oversight that may result inmisunderstanding by some of the dedicated people who have given years of theirlives working in the camps.[E#10] (Sub-function 9) On the whole, the basic ideas and models are presentedin enough detail to make the book substantially self-contained in the way that atext-book needs to be, while at the same time providing a fairly rapid tourthrough, and guide to, an extensive literature, appropriate to a reference book.One feature the book shares with many other macro texts is that it devotes littlespace to explicitly international or open-economy issues. In part, this surelyreflects the fact that many of the recent advances upon which they focus are notexplicitly international, and are conducted at a level of generality where theclosedness or openness of the economy is a small detail. An equally magisterialtreatment of open-economy issues will require another book.The second shift concerns focus, which also signals change in the topic ofdiscussion. This shift can be marked in different ways:(a) By amplifying the focus applied in the preceding Move 2, where the revieweris describing a given chapter or extra-text material section. As the reviewer goes on toMove 3, the attention becomes focused on the text as a whole as the object of evaluation.This can be signaled by:(i) Lexical phrases indicating that the focus now is on the book as a whole, theauthor, the reader, or on the general topic of the book: