16.07.2015 Views

Tony Bennett, Differing diversities - Council of Europe

Tony Bennett, Differing diversities - Council of Europe

Tony Bennett, Differing diversities - Council of Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Differing</strong> <strong>diversities</strong>Contemporary debates have developed Taylor’s insights by claiming that differenceneeds to be considered as the constant intersection <strong>of</strong> many features wherenone <strong>of</strong> them can claim importance over another (Agamben, 1993: 29-38). Thisapproach advocates the intrinsic hybridity <strong>of</strong> identities. This condition <strong>of</strong> “inbetweenness”1 presupposes a deeper acceptance <strong>of</strong> human existence as a porous,constant flux <strong>of</strong> definitions and redefinitions where nobody belongs completely toany one identity. This way, differences proliferate, opening the way to constantcultural contamination.This ideal <strong>of</strong> infinite cultural translation, however, poses serious policy implicationsas it radically challenges traditional top-down interventions, which have s<strong>of</strong>ar been bent on efficiently keeping difference within, for example, the narrowconstraints <strong>of</strong> multiculturalism. Moreover, if it is true that culture has always beenan arena <strong>of</strong> negotiation, and that globalisation has, to a certain extent, always beenpresent in the constant and reciprocal exchange between continents, cultures andsocial groups, the challenge posed by the new spatial logic <strong>of</strong> the informationalrevolution could seriously impinge on any attempts by any single state to legislatefor any single cultural identity.As Manuel Castells argues (1994: 20):“The informational revolution allows for the simultaneous process <strong>of</strong> centralisation<strong>of</strong> messages and decentralisation <strong>of</strong> their reception, creating a new communicationsworld made up at the same time <strong>of</strong> the global village and <strong>of</strong> theincommunicability <strong>of</strong> those communities that are switched <strong>of</strong>f from the globalnetwork.”This highlights two main features in contemporary urban living that policy makerscannot afford to ignore: that <strong>of</strong> spatial segregation and the commodification <strong>of</strong>space.Citizenship, says the geographer Alisdair Rogers (n.d.: 6-7), is inconceivablewithout some reference to its spatiality, and, if one thinks, for instance, about themass <strong>of</strong> homeless people expelled from the business and tourist districts in twentieth-centurywestern cities, it becomes evident that the denial <strong>of</strong> citizenship is<strong>of</strong>ten experienced also through physical, social and economic exclusion from suchspaces.Conversely, state multiculturalism has at times fostered an approach akin to acommodification <strong>of</strong> public space, a space where consumers and not citizens areallowed. Here the city <strong>of</strong>fers itself as a stage <strong>of</strong> an empty spectacle to be viewedby a mass audience (Harvey, 1989). The result <strong>of</strong> this is the creation in some cities<strong>of</strong> a sort <strong>of</strong> “multicultural theme park” where differences are sanitised through theconsumption <strong>of</strong> “exotic” cultural products. In global cities, on the other hand, ascompetition for scarce public resources between different stakeholders makescommunity politics a politics <strong>of</strong> conflict over the allocation <strong>of</strong> resources,marginalised social groups are increasingly claiming their right to ensure that their__________1. Bhabha, 1997.124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!