<strong>Differing</strong> <strong>diversities</strong>Whereas in the United States precedents <strong>of</strong> the concept can be traced back to thecivic programmes <strong>of</strong> the New Deal and to the strong tradition <strong>of</strong> neighbourhoodbasedcommunity arts centres, in Australia applications <strong>of</strong> the concept can berelated to the community cultural development <strong>of</strong> the 1980s, and to the localautonomy lent by the federal systems <strong>of</strong> government to local agencies, whichcould then run independent cultural development programmes. In <strong>Europe</strong>, whereaesthetic definitions <strong>of</strong> culture tend to prevail and policies for the arts are rarelyco-ordinated with other policies, cultural planning has had, so far, little application.In the United Kingdom, however, in the past five years, strategies for thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> the cultural industries sector have partly been based on a frameworkwhich, in its attempt to move away from basic cultural policy-led urbanregeneration, could be said to be close to a cultural planning approach. This is dueamong other things, to the fact that policy makers tend to interpret the notion <strong>of</strong>local cultural resources in a rather narrow way, mostly as heritage, thus overlookingpotential synergies between sub-sectors <strong>of</strong> the local cultural economies.By reviewing some examples <strong>of</strong> good practice in the application <strong>of</strong> cultural planningin different social and economic contexts, and by analysing some recent<strong>Europe</strong>an policy frameworks which take an integrated developmental approach,the next section <strong>of</strong> the paper assesses the capacity <strong>of</strong> cultural planning to deal withissues <strong>of</strong> social and economic development within cultural diversity.Cultural planning – a review <strong>of</strong> current applicationsThe central characteristics <strong>of</strong> cultural planning, as described by Bianchini and I,are a very broad, anthropological definition <strong>of</strong> “culture” as “a way <strong>of</strong> life”, alongwith the integration <strong>of</strong> the arts into other aspects <strong>of</strong> local culture, and into the textureand routines <strong>of</strong> daily life in the city. 1 Cultural planning, furthermore, can helpurban governments identify the cultural resources <strong>of</strong> a city or locality and to applythem in a strategic way to achieve key objectives in areas such as communitydevelopment, place marketing or industrial development. More precisely, in thewords <strong>of</strong> Mercer (1991a), “cultural planning is the strategic and integral planningand use <strong>of</strong> cultural resources in urban and community development”.Cultural resources are here understood in a pragmatic way and include not only thearts and heritage <strong>of</strong> a place, but also local traditions, dialects, festivals and rituals;the diversity and quality <strong>of</strong> leisure; cultural, drinking and eating and entertainmentfacilities; the cultures <strong>of</strong> youth, ethnic minorities and communities <strong>of</strong> interest; andthe repertoire <strong>of</strong> local products and skills in the crafts, manufacturing and servicesectors. Cultural planning has therefore a much wider remit than cultural policy.In moving away from a narrow definition <strong>of</strong> culture as art, and in putting culturalresources at its centre, Mercer (1991b) argues that, compared to traditional culturalpolicies, cultural planning is intrinsically more democratic, more conscious__________1. See Bianchini and Ghilardi Santacatterina, 1997; Bianchini and Parkinson, 1993.126
Reasearch position paper 4<strong>of</strong> the realities <strong>of</strong> cultural diversity and more aware <strong>of</strong> the intangible features <strong>of</strong>cultural heritage and patrimony.Key moments <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the concept in the Australian context havebeen:i. the 1990 Brisbane Cultural Development Strategy (Mercer, 1991b), which firstoutlined the logic behind cultural planning and guaranteed a wide circulation<strong>of</strong> the model among policy makers keen to develop a framework for the strategicdevelopment <strong>of</strong> their community’s culture;ii. the Joondalup Cultural Plan, which was the first time the principles had beenapplied to a newly built greenfield city development;iii. the endorsement in 1993 by three levels <strong>of</strong> government <strong>of</strong> the cultural developmentpolicy framework in south east Queensland; andiv. the publication <strong>of</strong> the Cultural Planning Handbook by Arts Queensland and theAustralia <strong>Council</strong>.Brisbane’s Cultural Development Strategy is particularly relevant as it constitutedthe first attempt to develop a truly culturally inclusive framework for the city. Inthis document, Colin Mercer stated a set <strong>of</strong> principles on which to base an effectivepolicy. One <strong>of</strong> them is that, to assure cultural pluralism, it is essential that culturalplanners understand what different segments comprise the community, conductdiscussions and carry out research with each group, and includerepresentations from each group on boards, committees and in the evaluation process.This principle calls for a community cultural assessment as an integral andnecessary component <strong>of</strong> cultural planning and establishes the objective presence<strong>of</strong> the community within the planning process rather than simply as an “object” <strong>of</strong>planning (Grogan and Mercer, 1995: 14-17).In addressing issues <strong>of</strong> access, equity, participation, employment and quality <strong>of</strong>life, cultural planning speaks also about the nature and meaning <strong>of</strong> civic cultureand redefines the civic realm <strong>of</strong> a place; in the case <strong>of</strong> Brisbane, this translatedinto, among other things, a special focus on women’s access to the city centre andits perception and external image as perceived by local ethnic and aboriginal communitiesand young people.In the United States, during the past twenty years, Partners for Livable Places – anon-pr<strong>of</strong>it organisation working locally to promote quality <strong>of</strong> life, economicdevelopment and social equity – has provided new thinking about cultural policywhich moves away from the compensatory logic <strong>of</strong> some arts programmes. It hasalso addressed issues <strong>of</strong> access, equity and participation within the framework <strong>of</strong>more general objectives for social and economic development at all levels: that <strong>of</strong>the city, the region, the state or the nation.In 1992, Robert McNulty, project director <strong>of</strong> Partners for Livable Places, publisheda collection <strong>of</strong> case studies focusing on cities and towns representing across-section <strong>of</strong> life in the United States. The overall aim <strong>of</strong> the research wasto place the arts and culture in the broader context <strong>of</strong> community development,127
- Page 5 and 6:
PrefaceThe present text constitutes
- Page 7:
Part IDiffering diversities:transve
- Page 11 and 12:
The study: background, contextand m
- Page 13 and 14:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 15:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 18:
Differing diversitiesi. new forms o
- Page 23 and 24:
IntroductionTransversal perspective
- Page 25 and 26:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 27 and 28:
The challenge of diversityCulture,
- Page 29 and 30:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 31 and 32:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 33 and 34:
Diversity, citizenship, and cultura
- Page 35 and 36:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 37:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 40 and 41:
Differing diversitieslanguages. The
- Page 42 and 43:
Differing diversitiesprogrammes int
- Page 45 and 46:
Culture, government and diversity:p
- Page 47 and 48:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 49 and 50:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 51 and 52:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 53:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 56 and 57:
Differing diversitiesin the pursuit
- Page 58 and 59:
Differing diversitiesthe need for m
- Page 60 and 61:
Differing diversitiescircumstances
- Page 62 and 63:
Differing diversitiesclasses artist
- Page 64 and 65:
Differing diversitiesMy point, then
- Page 66 and 67:
Differing diversitiesiii. that the
- Page 69:
Transversal study on the theme of c
- Page 73 and 74:
The consequences of European media
- Page 75 and 76: Reasearch position paper 1and contr
- Page 77 and 78: Reasearch position paper 1directly
- Page 79 and 80: Reasearch position paper 1There hav
- Page 81 and 82: Reasearch position paper 1presence
- Page 83 and 84: Reasearch position paper 1Strategic
- Page 85 and 86: Reasearch position paper 1New media
- Page 87 and 88: Reasearch position paper 1Blumler,
- Page 89 and 90: Reasearch position paper 1Hoffmann-
- Page 91 and 92: Reasearch position paper 1Pauwels,
- Page 93 and 94: Assessing the implementationof cult
- Page 95 and 96: Reasearch position paper 2tics abou
- Page 97 and 98: Reasearch position paper 2Act (GPRA
- Page 99 and 100: Reasearch position paper 2factually
- Page 101 and 102: Reasearch position paper 2The evalu
- Page 103 and 104: Reasearch position paper 2capacity
- Page 105 and 106: Reasearch position paper 2Luchtenbe
- Page 107 and 108: The cultural policies of the Europe
- Page 109 and 110: Reasearch position paper 3went, wou
- Page 111 and 112: Reasearch position paper 3The histo
- Page 113 and 114: Reasearch position paper 3integrati
- Page 115 and 116: Reasearch position paper 3of differ
- Page 117 and 118: Reasearch position paper 3European
- Page 119 and 120: Reasearch position paper 3voice to
- Page 121: Reasearch position paper 3Howe, Mar
- Page 124 and 125: Differing diversitiesContemporary d
- Page 128 and 129: Differing diversitiesbuilding on th
- Page 130 and 131: Differing diversitieswhen tackling
- Page 132 and 133: Differing diversitiesand that is pr
- Page 134 and 135: Differing diversitiesSennett, Richa
- Page 136 and 137: Differing diversitiesallowing their
- Page 138 and 139: Differing diversitiesNevertheless,
- Page 140 and 141: Differing diversitiesgrowth also ex
- Page 142 and 143: Differing diversitiesAt a deeper le
- Page 144 and 145: Differing diversitiesconventional c
- Page 146 and 147: Differing diversitiesworks, and the
- Page 148 and 149: Differing diversitiesNational sover
- Page 150 and 151: Differing diversitiesSimilarly, at
- Page 152 and 153: Differing diversitiesCoombe, Rosema
- Page 154 and 155: Differing diversitiesWoodmansee, Ma
- Page 156 and 157: Differing diversitiesIndeed, which
- Page 158 and 159: Differing diversitiesThe second maj
- Page 160 and 161: Differing diversitiesexample by Hol
- Page 162 and 163: Differing diversitiesincreased broa
- Page 164 and 165: Differing diversities“Black Carib
- Page 166 and 167: Differing diversitiesBunt, Gary, 19
- Page 169 and 170: Preserving cultural diversity throu
- Page 171 and 172: Reasearch position paper 7unique, t
- Page 173 and 174: Reasearch position paper 7legislati
- Page 175 and 176: Reasearch position paper 7appropria
- Page 177 and 178:
Reasearch position paper 7Indeed, m
- Page 179 and 180:
Reasearch position paper 7- means t
- Page 181 and 182:
Reasearch position paper 7cyberspac
- Page 183 and 184:
Reasearch position paper 7extended
- Page 185 and 186:
Reasearch position paper 7It is rec
- Page 187 and 188:
Reasearch position paper 7lose loca
- Page 189 and 190:
Reasearch position paper 7six proje
- Page 191 and 192:
Reasearch position paper 7and innov
- Page 193 and 194:
Reasearch position paper 7Programme
- Page 195 and 196:
Reasearch position paper 7Reference
- Page 197 and 198:
Reasearch position paper 7Papers on
- Page 199:
Reasearch position paper 7Swaminath
- Page 202:
Sales agents for publications of th