16.07.2015 Views

Tony Bennett, Differing diversities - Council of Europe

Tony Bennett, Differing diversities - Council of Europe

Tony Bennett, Differing diversities - Council of Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Executive summary and recommendationsIn its broader meaning, when interpreted in the light <strong>of</strong> the concerns <strong>of</strong> culturaldemocracy, the promotion <strong>of</strong> cultural diversity involves supporting the right to bedifferent <strong>of</strong> all those who, in one way or another, have been placed outside dominantsocial and cultural norms: disabled people, gays and lesbians, women, thepoor, and the elderly as well as immigrant or indigenous groups. The needs <strong>of</strong>more finely-grained policies, however, require that the issues involved in these differing<strong>diversities</strong> be distinguished from one another.The forms <strong>of</strong> diversity focused on in this study are those ethnically-marked culturaldifferences associated with the international movement <strong>of</strong> peoples and,within national territories, the claims to difference associated with the protractedstruggles <strong>of</strong> in situ minorities to maintain their identity and specificity in the face<strong>of</strong> the homogenising force <strong>of</strong> national cultures. These are distinguished from other<strong>diversities</strong> by the respects in which they challenge the basic grammar <strong>of</strong> nationalcultures in emerging from relations between peoples, histories, cultures and territorieswhich cannot be reconciled with nationalist projects. They also involveforms <strong>of</strong> difference that have been tangled up with the histories <strong>of</strong> racism andcolonialism which have played so crucial a part in the processes <strong>of</strong> nation formation.These forms <strong>of</strong> diversity can be further divided into four types:i. sub- or multinational, which dispute the homogenising tendencies <strong>of</strong> nationalcultures, but do so on the basis <strong>of</strong> essentially similar strategies by articulatinga competing set <strong>of</strong> associations between a territory, its people and their culture;ii. autochthonous, distinguishing the situation and circumstances <strong>of</strong> ethnicallymarkedminority communities that are the result <strong>of</strong> earlier movements <strong>of</strong> peoples(or <strong>of</strong> national boundaries) within <strong>Europe</strong>;iii. diasporic, referring to the cultures produced in association with the histories <strong>of</strong>displaced peoples, involving the development <strong>of</strong> mobile international culturalnetworks operating across, and <strong>of</strong>fering an alternative to, the territorial logic <strong>of</strong>national cultures;iv. indigenous, which, developed in the context <strong>of</strong> resistance to colonial histories<strong>of</strong> occupation, typically contest dominant national cultures, by national mappings<strong>of</strong> people, culture, history and territory mobilising deeper and longer histories<strong>of</strong> indigenous cultural continuity.There are three major <strong>Europe</strong>an contextual factors that need to be taken intoaccount in considering the relations between cultural policy and cultural diversity:17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!