16.07.2015 Views

Tony Bennett, Differing diversities - Council of Europe

Tony Bennett, Differing diversities - Council of Europe

Tony Bennett, Differing diversities - Council of Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reasearch position paper 1There have been a number <strong>of</strong> trend studies examining (and comparing) the impact<strong>of</strong> commercialisation and expansion on the programming <strong>of</strong> the main televisionchannels. 1 There is evidence <strong>of</strong> convergence in the balance <strong>of</strong> content types inmainstream television, especially as between public and commercial channels.Although the changes during the decade from late 1980s to late 1990s do not seemdramatic, there has been a trend for public broadcasting to move information andcultural programming out <strong>of</strong> peak viewing hours and also to suffer a decline inaudience. The overall effect is probably some loss <strong>of</strong> diversity in television experiencefor average viewers.Tabloidisation and cultural decline?There has been a good deal <strong>of</strong> debate and some research about another effect <strong>of</strong>“Americanisation”, arriving on the back <strong>of</strong> commercialisation. This concerns thequality <strong>of</strong> information that is made available by media to citizens, especially inrelation to participation in political life. The thesis <strong>of</strong> “video-malaise” and “TVtabloidisation”links the quantity and type <strong>of</strong> typical television (info-tainment)with lower levels <strong>of</strong> information, more cynicism and less willingness to participatein civic life. Schulz (1997) presents some supporting evidence <strong>of</strong> this in relation tothe German audience. Brants (1998) casts doubt on the reality <strong>of</strong> any decline in thequality <strong>of</strong> politics on media. Some other studies in Germany also support thiscounter-view. 2Some media researchers, especially in the cultural studies tradition, do not acceptindicators <strong>of</strong> change in the form <strong>of</strong> “popularisation” or even “Americanisation” atface value as evidence <strong>of</strong> “decline”. 3 While there is probably more superficialityand sensationalism, there are many examples <strong>of</strong> new popular genres and formats(talkshows, breakfast television, debates, phone-ins) which have a capacity <strong>of</strong>connecting personal and emotional concerns with public issues. They are alsomore likely to involve women in the public sphere than did the older, elite, maledominatedand newspaper-led form <strong>of</strong> politics (Livingstone and Lunt, 1994). Theycan also <strong>of</strong>fer opportunities <strong>of</strong> access for cultural minority voices (Leurdijk,1997).Sub-nation, region and languageAt the sub-national level, a good deal <strong>of</strong> research has inventorised the survival andeven flourishing <strong>of</strong> media in the regional language and indicated some <strong>of</strong> the preconditionsfor survival and the pressures to fail. 4 Policy and subsidy can <strong>of</strong>ten bevery helpful, although there must be some base in popular support as well andsome potential financial viability. In general it is agreed that any regional identityhas to precede any successful media provision. The question <strong>of</strong> language is closely__________1. See Chaniac, 1994; Hellman and Sauri, 1994; Krüger, 1997; McQuail and Siune, 1998; De Bens andDe Smaele, 2001; Moragas and Prado, 2000; RAI, n.d.2. For instance Bruns and Marcinkowski, 1996.3. See Dahlgren, 1995; Hermes, 1997.4. See Garitaonandía, 1993; Cormack, 1998; Bulck and Poecke, 1996.79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!