01.05.2017 Views

632598256894

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eturns of its stockholders in proportion to shares of stock owned, regardless of whether those profits<br />

were distributed to the stockholders or retained for operations. Losses appear on the returns of the<br />

stockholders and may potentially be used to shelter other income.<br />

Although the subchapter S corporation is often referred to as a “small business corporation,” the<br />

size of the business has no bearing on whether this election is available. Any corporation that meets<br />

the following five tests may, but need not, elect to be taxed as a subchapter S corporation:<br />

1. It must have 100 or fewer stockholders.<br />

2. It may have only one class of stock (although variations in voting rights are acceptable).<br />

3. All stockholders must be individuals (or certain trusts and nonprofits).<br />

4. No stockholder may be a nonresident alien.<br />

5. With certain exceptions, it may not own or be owned by another corporation.<br />

The subchapter S corporation is particularly suited to resolving the problems presented by certain<br />

discrete situations. For example, if a corporation is concerned that its profits are likely to be too high<br />

to eliminate double taxation through compensation to its stockholders, the subchapter S election<br />

eliminates the worry over unreasonable compensation. Since there is no tax at the corporate level, it is<br />

not necessary to establish the right to a compensation deduction. Similarly, if a corporation has<br />

nonemployee stockholders who insist on current distributions of profit, the subchapter S election<br />

would allow declaration of dividends without the worry of double taxation. This would undoubtedly<br />

be attractive to most publicly traded corporations were it not for the 100-stockholder limitation<br />

mentioned earlier.<br />

Many entrepreneurs have turned to the subchapter S election in order to eliminate the two layers of<br />

tax otherwise payable upon sale or dissolution of a corporation. The corporate tax otherwise payable<br />

upon the gain realized on the sale of corporate assets is eliminated by the use of the subchapter S<br />

election, as long as the election has been in effect for 10 years or, if less, since the corporation‟s<br />

inception. Finally, many entrepreneurs elect subchapter S status for their corporations if they expect to<br />

show losses in the short term. These losses can then be passed through to their individual tax returns to<br />

act as shelters for other income. When the corporation begins to show a profit, the election can be<br />

reversed.<br />

Limited Partnerships<br />

The tax treatment of limited partnerships is much the same as general partnerships. The profits and<br />

losses of the business are passed through to the partners in the proportions set forth in the partnership<br />

agreement. It must be emphasized that these profits and losses are passed through to all partners,<br />

including limited partners, even though one could argue that those profits and losses are derived<br />

entirely from the efforts of the general partners. It is this aspect of the limited partnership that made it<br />

the form of choice for tax-sheltered investments. The loss incurred by the business (much of which<br />

was independent of cash flow through depreciation and the like), could be passed through to the<br />

limited partners who, typically, had a considerable amount of other investment and compensation<br />

income to be sheltered.<br />

Although the tax treatments of limited partnerships and subchapter S corporations are similar, there<br />

are some differences that drove the operators of tax shelters to use partnerships over the corporate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!