01.05.2017 Views

632598256894

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lean‟s equity has increased by the $18 million of new shares it issued to pay for the deal.<br />

Entire volumes have been written on the accounting treatment of acquisitions, and this is a very<br />

complex and dynamic issue. Because of this, it is important to get timely, expert advice on these issues<br />

from competent professionals.<br />

Tax Issues<br />

Taxes were discussed briefly in the paragraph comparing cash and stock deals. In a tax-free<br />

transaction, the acquired assets are maintained at their historical levels and target firm shareholders<br />

don‟t pay taxes until they sell the shares received in the transaction. To qualify as a tax-free deal, there<br />

must be a valid business purpose for the acquisition and the bidder must continue to operate the<br />

acquired business. In a taxable transaction, the assets and liabilities acquired are marked up to reflect<br />

current market values, and target firm shareholders are liable for capital gain taxes on the shares they<br />

sell.<br />

In most cases, selling shareholders would prefer a tax-free deal. In the study by Weston and<br />

Johnson (1999), 65% of the transactions were nontaxable. However, there are situations where a<br />

taxable transaction may be preferred. If the target has few shareholders with other tax losses, their gain<br />

on the deal can be used to offset these losses. A taxable deal might also be optimal if the tax savings<br />

from the additional depreciation and amortization outweigh the capital gain taxes. In this case, the<br />

savings could be split between the target and bidder shareholders (at the expense of the government).<br />

Again, it is important to get current, expert advice from knowledgeable tax accountants when<br />

structuring any transaction.<br />

Antitrust Concerns<br />

Regulators around the world routinely review M&A transactions and have the power to disallow deals<br />

if they feel they are anticompetitive or will give the merged firm too much market power. More likely<br />

than an outright rejection are provisions that require the deal‟s participants to modify their strategic<br />

plan or to divest certain assets. When the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) approved the 2006 $27<br />

billion acquisition of Guidant Corporation by Boston Scientific, it required the merged firm to divest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!