01.05.2017 Views

632598256894

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bank, owns a large block of NASDAQ stocks. Back Bay would like to diversify into NASDAQ<br />

stocks, and simultaneously Capital Bank would like to diversify into S&P 500 stocks. The oldfashioned<br />

way of achieving the desired objectives would be for each party to sell the stocks they do<br />

not want and reinvest the proceeds in the stocks they do want. Such an approach is very expensive in<br />

terms of commissions. A much cheaper alternative is for each party to keep its own portfolio intact,<br />

and arrange between themselves an equity swap.<br />

Exhibit 15.5 Equity swap.<br />

The swap agreement might dictate the following terms. For every percentage point that the<br />

NASDAQ stock index rises over the course of the year, Capital Bank will pay Back Bay Investment<br />

Management $1 million. Simultaneously, for every percentage point that the S&P 500 rises over the<br />

course of the year, Back Bay will pay Capital Bank $1 million. Thus, if the NASDAQ index rises 15%<br />

and the S&P 500 rises 11%, there will be a net payment of $4 million from Capital Bank to Back Bay.<br />

If in the following year the NASDAQ index rises 23% and the S&P 500 rises 29%, Back Bay will pay<br />

Capital Bank $6 million on net. The equity swap is illustrated in Exhibit 15.5.<br />

In this equity swap, the notional principal is $100 million; that is, the payments equal a base of $100<br />

million times the indexes‟ respective returns. The net effect of the swap is to essentially convert $100<br />

million of Back Bay‟s Standard & Poor‟s stocks into $100 million of NASDAQ stocks.<br />

Simultaneously, $100 million of Capital Bank‟s NASDAQ stocks will now perform as if they were<br />

$100 million of Standard & Poor‟s 500 stocks. Both sides keep their assets parked where they were,<br />

but they swap exposures on the notional principal.<br />

Some arithmetic will prove the point that Back Bay‟s portfolio will now perform as if it were<br />

invested in NASDAQ stocks instead of S&P stocks. If Back Bay did in fact own $100 million of<br />

NASDAQ stocks, by the end of the first year, after the 15% rise in NASDAQ stocks, this portfolio<br />

would have grown to be worth $115 million. But Back Bay owns $100 million of S&P stocks, and has<br />

a position in an equity swap. The $100 million of S&P stocks grows to $111 million after the 11%<br />

S&P rise in the first year. The swap, however, pays Back Bay $4 million at the end of the first year.<br />

Thus, at the end of the first year, Back Bay does have $115 million in total portfolio value. The total<br />

value of Capital Bank‟s portfolio at the end of the first year will be $111 million, just as if it had<br />

invested $100 million in S&P stocks.<br />

Since the notional principal remains fixed at $100 million, the swap will continue to convert $100<br />

million of Back Bay‟s S&P stocks into $100 million of NASDAQ stocks, and vice versa for Capital<br />

Bank. Total portfolio performance in subsequent years depends on how the swap proceeds are<br />

reinvested by each party.<br />

Exhibit 15.6 Interest rate swap.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!