01.05.2017 Views

632598256894

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Finally, the last step is to choose whether the instruments should be of the exchange-traded or overthe-counter<br />

variety. Forwards and swaps are over-the-counter instruments; futures are exchangetraded<br />

instruments. Options are generally exchange-traded, but they can also be bought over the<br />

counter. Exchange-traded instruments are standardized, and are thus liquid and entail low transaction<br />

costs. But since they are standardized, they may not perfectly suit the risk exposure the firm wishes to<br />

hedge. Over-the-counter instruments can be custom tailored, but they are therefore less liquid and<br />

more expensive in terms of transaction costs. The firm must weigh the costs and benefits of liquidity,<br />

differences in transaction costs, and custom fit. The correct choice depends on the particular hedging<br />

situation.<br />

A couple of examples will illustrate the process of putting all the factors together to pick the bestsuited<br />

hedge. An American manufacturing firm owns a production facility in Canada. Rent and wages<br />

are paid in Canadian dollars. Consequently, if the Canadian dollar rises in value, the wages and rent<br />

translated into American dollars would become more expensive. If the Canadian dollar falls, the<br />

expenses in terms of American dollars decline. Thus, the exposure is symmetric. If the firm wishes to<br />

completely eliminate the exposure, a symmetric instrument is called for, ruling out options.<br />

The firm should go long in Canadian dollar futures or forwards, since either of these instruments<br />

will provide positive cash flows when the Canadian dollar is rising. An exchange-traded Canadian<br />

dollar futures contract is available. The commission on the forward is greater than the commission on<br />

the futures, but the futures contract covers slightly more Canadian dollars than the firm wishes to<br />

hedge, and the timing does not exactly correspond to the timing of wage and rent payments. An overthe-counter<br />

forward contract could be constructed so that cash flows are synchronized with wage and<br />

rent payments. After weighing the two alternatives, the managers decide that the benefit from lower<br />

commissions on the futures contract outweighs the disadvantage of the futures‟ slight mismatch in the<br />

hedge. They go long in Canadian dollar futures.<br />

The same manufacturing firm has many customers in Venezuela. If the Venezuelan currency (the<br />

bolivar) falls in value, the American dollar value of the revenue will fall. If the Venezuelan currency<br />

rises in value, the dollar revenue will rise. Thus, the risk is symmetric, and so the list of hedging<br />

candidates is narrowed to futures and forwards. The firm benefits from a rise in the bolivar, and loses<br />

when the bolivar falls. Thus, the firm should go short in bolivar futures or forwards, so that a cash<br />

flow will be received if the bolivar falls. No bolivar futures contracts are available on exchanges, so<br />

the firm must go short in over-the-counter Venezuelan bolivar forwards.<br />

A producer of copper wire purchases large amounts of copper as a raw material. When copper<br />

prices rise, the firm must either absorb the higher expenses or raise the price of copper wire. Raising<br />

the price of wire, however, causes customers to cut back on purchases, causing the firm to be stuck<br />

with unsold inventory. When copper prices fall, alternatively, competitors lower their prices, so the<br />

firm must also lower its price in order to sell its output. Consequently, the firm‟s profits suffer when<br />

copper prices rise, but profits do not increase when copper prices fall. Management would like to<br />

increase production capacity, but it is difficult to forecast how much the firm can sell, given recent<br />

copper price fluctuations. With current levels of raw copper inventory, management believes that raw<br />

copper prices can rise as much as 10% without significantly impacting the firm‟s bottom line. What is<br />

the appropriate hedge?<br />

Clearly, the firm faces an asymmetric risk. The firm is hurt when copper prices rise, but does not<br />

benefit when the price falls. An option will best mitigate the risk. Since the firm is hurt when copper<br />

prices rise, a call option that pays off when copper prices rise is the best choice. Since the firm can

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!