01.05.2017 Views

632598256894

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A large part of the budget selling strategy may be determined by the nature of the budget review<br />

audience, whether it is one person or a group of people. Information that may prove essential to the<br />

successful budget approval effort includes:<br />

• Strategies that have succeeded or failed in the past.<br />

• Pet peeves or special likes of review members.<br />

• A variety of other committee characteristics.<br />

Make a Professional Presentation<br />

Not all managers approach the budgeting process with the same level of enthusiasm. By the time<br />

budget review arrives, some managers just want to get it over with. Such an attitude can easily show<br />

during the budget review process. Review committees may interpret it as disdain for one‟s job and<br />

one‟s management function in general. Often the result is unfavorable action on the budget proposals<br />

under review.<br />

A professional presentation includes:<br />

• Enthusiasm and polish.<br />

• A neat, concise, and understandable budget proposal.<br />

• Ample supporting documentation.<br />

• A willingness and ability to answer relevant questions.<br />

Quantify the Material<br />

Because most resource allocation decisions are in some way affected by their cost-benefit<br />

relationships, it is necessary to quantify both the costs and benefits of virtually all budget proposals.<br />

Cost estimation is seldom easy, but it is usually far easier than the measurement of benefits. Even in<br />

the private sector, benefits are not always easy to measure in terms of the corporate goals of<br />

profitability and liquidity. In the not-for-profit sector, benefit measurement is even more difficult. For<br />

example, how does one measure the benefits of 20 new park rangers, 10 new police cars, or a<br />

decorative fountain in the city park? Obviously the quantification process would be different for each<br />

of these, and direct comparisons could be inconclusive. Yet, such comparisons may be necessary in<br />

arriving at final budget allocations.<br />

It is easy to dismiss the value of quantification when the resulting numbers are hard to compare<br />

with other budget proposals, or the numbers are hard to verify. Nevertheless, some quantitative<br />

support typically is better than mere general statements about the desirability of the budget proposal.<br />

Budget salesmanship should be approached with the same ingenuity that is found in the external<br />

marketing effort. If certain budget proposals have benefits that are difficult to quantify directly,<br />

various types of statistics might support the projects in an indirect way. For example, if a police<br />

department wants to justify 10 new police officers, it might offer supporting statistics on rising<br />

population in the community, rising crime rates, or relatively low per-capita police cost ratios.<br />

Although none of the suggested statistics measures direct benefits, they may be more useful in<br />

swaying a budget review committee than a vague statement about the value of more officers. Statistics

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!