01.05.2017 Views

632598256894

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tolerate a 10% rise in copper prices without suffering significant losses, an out-of-the-money copper<br />

call option that begins to pay off only when copper prices rise more than 10% is ideal. Exchangetraded<br />

copper call options exist, so, due to their greater liquidity and low transaction costs, they would<br />

be the best choice.<br />

A cellular communications firm has sold a six-year variable-rate bond whose interest payments are<br />

tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). When LIBOR rises, so too do the company‟s<br />

interest payments. When LIBOR falls, the firm‟s interest payments fall. The company‟s interest<br />

payments are due twice a year, on the last days of February and August. The firm raised $160 million<br />

this way. With competition holding cellular telephone rates down, the executives worry that an<br />

increase in interest rates can wipe out all profits. What is the appropriate hedge instrument?<br />

The interest rate exposure is symmetric, ruling out options. The firm needs an instrument that will<br />

pay it money when interest rates rise. Thus, the firm should go short in either bond futures or<br />

forwards, or the firm should be the fixed-rate payer in an interest rate swap. Since the cash flows that<br />

the firm is trying to hedge do not conform to those of any exchange-traded futures contract, the correct<br />

choice is narrowed to the over-the-counter instruments—a forward or a swap. The firm must hedge 12<br />

interest rate payments, two per year for six years. Forwards are generally constructed to provide one<br />

payment only. Swaps are designed to hedge multiple payments over longer terms. Thus, entering a<br />

six-year interest rate swap as the fixed payer is the ideal hedge in this situation.<br />

Summary and Final Recommendations<br />

This chapter has presented the basics of risk management using derivatives. By separating an asset‟s<br />

value from its exposure, derivatives allow firms to exchange exposures without exchanging the<br />

underlying assets. It is much more economical to transfer exposures rather than assets, and thus<br />

derivatives have greatly facilitated risk management. Derivatives are indeed powerful risk<br />

management tools, but in the wrong hands they can be dangerous and destructive. It is essential that<br />

managers fully understand how much and under what conditions derivatives will provide positive cash<br />

flows or require cash outflows. If it is not absolutely clear when and how much the cash flows will be,<br />

do not enter the contract. Managers should strive to identify the nature, magnitude, and size of their<br />

risk exposures. They can then match those exposures with countervailing positions in derivatives.<br />

Managers should never forget that their job is to preserve value by reducing risk. The temptation to<br />

speculate should be avoided. Don‟t be greedy.<br />

Notes<br />

1 Zvi Bodie and Robert C. Merton, Financial Economics, 2nd ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice<br />

Hall, 2009) deserve credit for this perspective on risk management techniques.<br />

2 Time, April 11, 1994.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!