01.05.2017 Views

632598256894

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(that is, overall sales would remain about the same at $1.1 billion but now with services and high-end<br />

each at 25%, or $275 million, and midrange at the other 50%, or $550 million).<br />

What would be the new estimated variable cost percentage, assuming pricing remains constant?<br />

Exhibit 12.6 demonstrates the impact on the variable cost element of the cost structure. The<br />

management of Company X seems to be planning well for this loss of value position. By driving the<br />

higher-contribution service business, if the 25% goal is attained, the cost structure would remain<br />

relatively the same, allowing Company X to maintain profitability at the same revenue level even with<br />

the negative shift of the product business. Unfortunately, sales mixes are always evolving, requiring<br />

constant vigilance of cost structure assumptions of competitors.<br />

Data Reporting Format<br />

In order to be thorough, one needs to read the footnotes that accompany the financial statements of the<br />

company under review. Often nonrecurring events such as write-offs of obsolete inventory are<br />

contained in the cost of sales figure. In this case, Company X did report a $15 million inventory<br />

charge in quarter 1 that was buried in the cost of sales number. This was pulled out of the “cost of<br />

sales” account and transferred to the “Other” account in order to once again focus only on the<br />

recurring nature of the costs. If this adjustment had not been made, the results for the quarter 1 to<br />

quarter 2 analysis would have shown an increase in sales of $35 million and a decrease in cost of sales<br />

of $4 million, clearly a result that makes no sense. Only in the footnotes was this revealed, which in<br />

turn led to the required adjustment which then yielded a meaningful result.<br />

Relevant Range Assumption<br />

So far the examples used to illustrate how cost structure analysis is employed in a competitive setting<br />

have assumed that (1) Company X had idle facilities sufficient to support a 10% increase in output and<br />

(2) a mix change would have no impact on facility requirements. Often this is not the case. The cost<br />

analysis discussed in the preceding pages of this chapter was applicable only for the current output<br />

capacity of Company X. If Company X were to grow beyond this, a new estimate would have to be<br />

calculated. Additional scale factors might drive variable costs down and would certainly increase fixed<br />

costs. Different industries have different inherent relevant ranges.<br />

Exhibits 12.5 X—Product Mix Analysis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!