27.12.2012 Views

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

English summary and there<strong>for</strong>e could not be compared to the guideline protocol. The study<br />

reported no adverse effect in these tests <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> dams that were exposed on gestational<br />

days 7-15 at doses as high as 200 mg/kg/day (the highest tested non-lethal dose that was a<br />

LOAEL <strong>for</strong> increased kidney weight). This study does not fully satisfy the developmental<br />

neurotoxicity endpoint because it omitted some parameters specified under the guideline:<br />

developmental landmarks <strong>for</strong> sexual maturity, auditory startle test, and neurohistopathological<br />

examinations.<br />

Additional neurotoxicity studies:<br />

• Schedule-Controlled Operant Behavior (mouse or rat)<br />

• OPPTS Harmonized Guideline 870.6500<br />

• Peripheral Nerve Function (rodent)<br />

• OPPTS Harmonized Guideline 870.6850<br />

• Sensory Evoked Potentials (rat, pigmented strain preferred)<br />

• OPPTS Harmonized Guideline 870.6855<br />

These studies may be indicated, <strong>for</strong> example, to follow up neurotoxic signs seen in other studies,<br />

or because <strong>of</strong> structural similarity <strong>of</strong> the substance to neurotoxicants that affect these endpoints.<br />

These studies may be combined with other toxicity studies.<br />

Conclusion: These endpoints do not appear to be applicable to TDCPP.<br />

Basis <strong>for</strong> Conclusion: Although there are no studies addressing these endpoints, there are no<br />

reliable data <strong>for</strong> TDCPP, and no structure-activity considerations, that indicate a need <strong>for</strong> these<br />

follow-up studies.<br />

Other Neurotoxicity Data<br />

Cholinesterase inhibition<br />

Fyrol FR-2 administered at 0, 2,000, or 3,980 mg/kg in corn oil was administered to groups <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

male Sprague-Dawley rats by oral gavage had no effect on plasma or erythrocyte cholinesterase<br />

levels measured 4 or 14 hours after dosing (Stauffer, 1972b).<br />

IMMUNOTOXICITY<br />

Conclusion:<br />

The available immunotoxicity data were judged inadequate to meet the endpoint.<br />

3-21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!