27.12.2012 Views

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Species, strain: Mouse lymphoma L5178Y<br />

Metabolic activation: None, phenobarbital-induced or PCB-induced<br />

Concentrations: 0, 0.005-0.03 :L/mL <strong>for</strong> phenobarbital-induced (4 concentrations), and 6<br />

concentrations up to 0.070 :L/mL <strong>for</strong> non-induced or PCB-induced mouse<br />

Purity: Not reported<br />

Method: Ten cells per concentration were analyzed.<br />

Results: TDCPP increased the incidence <strong>of</strong> sister chromatid exchanges in mouse lymphocytes<br />

under all three test conditions.<br />

Reference: Brusick et al., 1979; also Litton Bionetics, Inc., 1977<br />

Additional In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

One submitted confidential study reported negative results in a sister chromatid exchange assay.<br />

The data <strong>for</strong> this study are not adequate because the cell line was not identified. Fyrol FR-2 did<br />

not induce sister chromatid exchanges when applied to 3- to 4-day-old chicken embryos (Bloom,<br />

1984).<br />

Chromosomal Aberration in Vivo:<br />

C Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosomal Aberration Test (OPPTS Harmonized<br />

Guideline 870.5385)<br />

The available study provides sufficient evidence that TDCPP did not induce chromosomal<br />

aberrations in mice exposed at the maximum tolerated dose <strong>of</strong> 760 mg/kg.<br />

Type: Bone marrow chromosomal aberration in vivo<br />

Species, strain: Mouse, CD-1, 4-8 males/group<br />

Metabolic activation: None<br />

Concentrations: 0, 0.05, 0.17, and 0.5 mL/kg; using the specific gravity <strong>of</strong> 1.52, the doses were<br />

0, 76, 260, or 760 mg/kg. The highest dose was the maximum tolerated dose. Negative control<br />

was DMSO<br />

Exposure duration, frequency: By oral gavage in once or daily on 5 consecutive days.<br />

Purity: Technical grade; Not reported<br />

Method: Mice were sacrificed at 6, 24, and 48 hours after single dose or 6 hours after the last <strong>of</strong><br />

5 doses. Between 233 and 400 cells were scored, rather than 500/animal. Triethylenemelamine<br />

was positive control.<br />

Results: No evidence <strong>of</strong> increased frequency <strong>of</strong> chromosomal aberrations with TDCPP. TBPP<br />

was also negative at doses up to 1,000 mg/kg. Positive control produce expected large increase<br />

in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes.<br />

Reference: Brusick et al., 1979; Litton Bionetics, Inc., 1978<br />

C Mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test (OPPTS Harmonized Guideline<br />

870.5395)<br />

3-26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!