27.12.2012 Views

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Terrestrial Organism Toxicity<br />

Acute Oral (OPPTS Harmonized Guideline 850.2100), Dietary (OPPTS Harmonized<br />

Guideline 850.2200; OECD Guideline 205), or Reproductive Toxicity (OPPTS Harmonized<br />

Guideline 850.2300; OECD Guideline 206) in Birds<br />

Conclusion:<br />

No available acute oral, dietary, and reproductive toxicity data <strong>for</strong> birds.<br />

Basis <strong>for</strong> Conclusion:<br />

No acute oral, dietary, or reproductive toxicity studies in birds were located.<br />

Earthworm Subchronic Toxicity (OPPTS Harmonized Guideline 850.6200; OECD<br />

Guideline 207)<br />

Conclusion:<br />

The available earthworm subchronic toxicity data were judged inadequate to meet the endpoint.<br />

Basis <strong>for</strong> Conclusion:<br />

No earthworm subchronic toxicity studies were located. An acute (14-hour) LC 50 <strong>of</strong> 130 mg/kg<br />

soil and a NOEC <strong>of</strong> 100 mg/kg soil with the earthworm, Eisenia fetida (Ref. 45), were reported<br />

in Ref. 29. However, the study has also been reported to be a 14-day subchronic toxicity study<br />

(Ref. 39). The study, or a study summary, was not available <strong>for</strong> an independent evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study and the results.<br />

4-39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!