27.12.2012 Views

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Combined Chronic Toxicity/Carcinogenicity (OPPTS Harmonized Guideline 870.4300;<br />

OECD Guideline 453)<br />

The protocol <strong>of</strong> a 2-year feeding bioassay in rats was consistent with this guideline (Ref. 9, 24).<br />

The published article focused on tumor results rather than non-neoplastic effects.<br />

Type: Combined oral chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity assay<br />

Species, strain, sex, number: Rat, Sprague-Dawley, 60/sex/group<br />

Purity: 95%<br />

Doses: 0, 5, 20, and 80 mg/kg body weight/day<br />

Vehicle: None other than feed<br />

Route: In feed; diets blended weekly to achieve target doses<br />

Exposure duration, frequency: 2 years, ad lib<br />

Method: Examined twice daily <strong>for</strong> mortality and clinical signs, weekly physical examination.<br />

Body weights and food consumption weekly <strong>for</strong> the first 13 weeks and biweekly thereafter.<br />

Ophthalmoscopic examinations every 6 months. Extensive hematology, clinical chemistry and<br />

urinalysis parameters at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Ten/sex/dose randomly chosen <strong>for</strong><br />

termination at 12 months; the remainder at 24 months. Gross necropsy including organ weights<br />

(8 organs plus gonads); histopathology <strong>of</strong> more than 30 tissues in control and high-dose rats; at<br />

low- and mid-doses, histopathology limited to liver, kidneys, testes, and adrenals. Statistical<br />

analyses.<br />

Results: The following changes compared to controls were statistically significant (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!