27.12.2012 Views

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Additional Studies and In<strong>for</strong>mation:<br />

Slight conjunctival erythema was observed in the eyes <strong>of</strong> 1/1 male and 1/2 female New Zealand<br />

White rabbits 24 hours after instillation with 0.01 mL <strong>of</strong> [Formulation 1] (mixture <strong>of</strong> Proprietary<br />

B and triphenyl phosphate) but was resolved by 48 hours (Ref. 15). No conjunctival discharge<br />

or effects on the cornea or iris were observed. The material was tentatively characterized as<br />

“practically non-irritating”, based on a maximum irritation score <strong>of</strong> 1.3/110 at 24 hours.<br />

In a parallel study in New Zealand White rabbits (1 male and 2 females) instilled with 0.01 mL<br />

[Formulation 2], there were no signs <strong>of</strong> eye irritation observed at 1, 24, 48, or 72 hours (Ref. 19).<br />

The material was tentatively characterized as non-irritating to the eyes based on a primary<br />

irritation index <strong>of</strong> 0/110 at all timepoints.<br />

Acute Dermal Irritation (OPPTS Harmonized Guideline 870.2500; OECD Guideline 404)<br />

Conclusion:<br />

The available dermal irritation data were judged inadequate to meet the endpoint.<br />

Basis <strong>for</strong> Conclusion:<br />

The available data are <strong>for</strong> undefined flame retardants <strong>for</strong> which compositional in<strong>for</strong>mation was<br />

not provided. The authors <strong>of</strong> the studies on the Durad materials referred to them as “nondefinitive”,<br />

although they were consistent with current guidelines.<br />

Additional Studies:<br />

No dermal irritation (erythema or edema) was observed in one male and two female New<br />

Zealand White rabbits that were dermally exposed <strong>for</strong> 4 hours to [Formulation 1] (mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

Proprietary B and triphenyl phosphate) on two occluded test sites (0.5 mL per site) and examined<br />

at 4.5, 24, 48, or 72 hours (Ref. 16). The material was tentatively rated as non-irritating to intact<br />

rabbit skin, based on scores <strong>of</strong> 0/8.0 at all timepoints.<br />

In a parallel dermal irritation study in one male and two female New Zealand White rabbits<br />

exposed <strong>for</strong> 4 hours to [Formulation 2] on two occluded test sites (0.5 mL per site), no irritation<br />

was observed at times between 4.5 and 72 hours (Ref. 20). The material was tentatively rated as<br />

non-irritating to intact rabbit skin, based on scores <strong>of</strong> 0/8.0 at all timepoints.<br />

In skin irritation assays in male New Zealand White rabbits (6/group), 24-hour topical<br />

administration (0.5 mL/site) <strong>of</strong> [Formulation 4] or [Formulation 10] did not elicit erythema or<br />

edema to intact or abraded skin (examined at 24 and 72 hours) (Ref. 6). The mean primary<br />

dermal irritation indices were 0/2.0 <strong>for</strong> both materials, which were characterized as non-irritating<br />

to skin.<br />

5-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!