27.12.2012 Views

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The material was tentatively characterized as non-irritating to the eyes based on a primary irritation<br />

index <strong>of</strong> 0/110 at all timepoints.<br />

Acute Dermal Irritation (OPPTS Harmonized Guideline 870.2500; OECD Guideline 404)<br />

Conclusion:<br />

The available dermal irritation data were judged inadequate to meet the endpoint.<br />

Basis <strong>for</strong> Conclusion:<br />

The available data are <strong>for</strong> undefined flame retardants <strong>for</strong> which compositional in<strong>for</strong>mation was not<br />

provided. The authors <strong>of</strong> the studies on the Durad materials referred to them as “non-definitive”,<br />

although they were consistent with current guidelines.<br />

Additional Studies:<br />

No dermal irritation (erythema or edema) was observed in one male and two female New Zealand<br />

White rabbits that were dermally exposed <strong>for</strong> 4 hours to [Formulation 1] (mixture <strong>of</strong> Proprietary G<br />

and triphenyl phosphate) on two occluded test sites (0.5 mL per site) and examined at 4.5, 24, 48,<br />

or 72 hours (Ref. 16). The material was tentatively rated as non-irritating to intact rabbit skin, based<br />

on scores <strong>of</strong> 0/8.0 at all timepoints.<br />

In a parallel dermal irritation study in one male and two female New Zealand White rabbits exposed<br />

<strong>for</strong> 4 hours to [Formulation 2] on two occluded test sites (0.5 mL per site), no irritation was observed<br />

at times between 4.5 and 72 hours (Ref. 20). The material was tentatively rated as non-irritating to<br />

intact rabbit skin, based on scores <strong>of</strong> 0/8.0 at all timepoints.<br />

In skin irritation assays in male New Zealand White rabbits (6/group), 24-hour topical<br />

administration (0.5 mL/site) <strong>of</strong> [Formulation 4] or [Formulation 10] did not elicit erythema or edema<br />

to intact or abraded skin (examined at 24 and 72 hours) (Ref. 6). The mean primary dermal irritation<br />

indices were 0/2.0 <strong>for</strong> both materials, which were characterized as non-irritating to skin.<br />

Skin Sensitization (OPPTS Harmonized Guideline 870.2600; OECD Guideline 429)<br />

Conclusion:<br />

The available skin sensitization data were judged inadequate to meet the endpoint.<br />

Basis <strong>for</strong> Conclusion:<br />

No studies were located that followed or were similar to the guideline listed above or otherwise<br />

addressed skin sensitization.<br />

10-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!