27.12.2012 Views

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

Environmental Profiles of Chemical Flame-Retardant Alternatives for

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

neurotoxicity in 4/4 hens treated with 300 mg/kg/day <strong>for</strong> 5 days (cumulative dose <strong>of</strong> 1,500 mg/kg).<br />

The acute oral LD50 in hens exceeded 10,000 mg/kg (no mortality data reported).<br />

Reference: Ref. 34<br />

Type: Acute oral delayed neurotoxicity<br />

Species, strain, sex, number: Hen, female, older than 14 months, 4 control and 8 test birds<br />

Purity: Not reported; [Formulation 3] is >99% Proprietary J and 99% purity<br />

and tested at doses as high as 1,000 mg/kg in mature hens <strong>for</strong> neurotoxicity and suppression <strong>of</strong><br />

neurotoxic esterase (Ref. 24). Details <strong>of</strong> these studies were not located. [<strong>Chemical</strong> 2], [<strong>Chemical</strong><br />

1], and Proprietary J elicited no signs <strong>of</strong> neurotoxicity and no suppression <strong>of</strong> NTE levels. [<strong>Chemical</strong><br />

7] was also judged to be non-neurotoxic, eliciting no ataxia or other signs <strong>of</strong> neurotoxicity and<br />

insignificant suppression <strong>of</strong> NTE (-4% or -15%) in two tests. However, [<strong>Chemical</strong> 8] was<br />

neurotoxic, eliciting ataxia and neurotoxicity, as well as suppression <strong>of</strong> NTE levels (by -71% and<br />

-57 to -62% in two tests) at 1 mL/kg. The author suggested that neurotoxicity was associated with<br />

[<strong>Chemical</strong> Class 1] with an oxidizable alpha-hydrogen.<br />

Hens given [Formulation 4] (100% [<strong>Chemical</strong> Class 1]; 30-35% Proprietary J, see Table 1) at a dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> 5,000 mg/kg/day on five consecutive days by oral gavage lost weight and developed paralysis<br />

(4/4) and 3/4 died be<strong>for</strong>e the end <strong>of</strong> the test (Ref. 14). The study authors suggested that residual<br />

[<strong>Chemical</strong> Class 4] chemicals may have been responsible <strong>for</strong> the observed neurotoxicity.<br />

Hens treated with 2,000 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> [Formulation 10] did not elicit clinical signs <strong>of</strong> neurotoxicity,<br />

lesions <strong>of</strong> the nervous system, or depression in NTE, whereas hens treated with TOCP at 500 mg/kg<br />

showed all <strong>of</strong> these effects (Ref. 35 abstract as described in Ref. 61).<br />

There was no effect on survival or walking behavior among a group <strong>of</strong> 15 hens (12-14 months old)<br />

given oral doses <strong>of</strong> 11, 679 mg/kg [Formulation 5] (see Note e in Table 1) on days 1 and 21 under<br />

13-17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!