31.12.2012 Views

The Cult of Tara

The Cult of Tara

The Cult of Tara

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88 MAGIC AND RITUAL IN TIBET<br />

This provocative surrealist model, however, gives only a limited<br />

analogue for the total collapse <strong>of</strong> the boundary between the public<br />

and private universes. What the surrealists call their "magic"<br />

indeed increases the repertoire <strong>of</strong> awareness, adding the imaginary<br />

to the objective at the same ontological level. But where the surrealist<br />

image is thrust upon a reality already given in experience,<br />

the Tibetan yogin sees the complete and absolute interpenetration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the two unitary fields. His image and his object are not superimposed,<br />

but rather are primordially one, and this is what makes<br />

possible his magical ability to manipulate the universe.<br />

Nevertheless, it was in the Western magical tradition that the<br />

surrealists found one <strong>of</strong> their most fruitful sources <strong>of</strong> ideas. <strong>The</strong><br />

omnipotence <strong>of</strong> the controlled imagination is a central concept in<br />

both magic and alchemy, where the boundaries blur even more<br />

dramatically, and "the vis imaginative, is nearly always present, for<br />

it is the fundamental, central force, and the others are usually used<br />

only as aids to heightening it or ways <strong>of</strong> communicating it." 131<br />

From<br />

this tradition the concept <strong>of</strong> the vera imaginatio entered into the<br />

occult "underground," to surface occasionally in such diverse persons<br />

as Aleister Crowley ("the wickedest man in England"), William<br />

Butler Yeats, and Andre Breton himself, who had read the thirteenth-century<br />

alchemist Raymond Lulle and was deeply unfluenced<br />

by Eliphas Levi, the 19th-century visionary and magus <strong>of</strong> "transcendental<br />

magic": 132<br />

Among the antinomies, the major one that Levi attacks is t<br />

antithesis between spiritual and material: to him it is merely<br />

matter <strong>of</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> opacity or <strong>of</strong> light; "Spiritual and corpor"<br />

are simply terms which express the degrees <strong>of</strong> unity or densi<br />

in substance." Man has in him the power to transform the opaq<br />

into the translucent; Eliphas Levi defines this power as i<br />

agination. "To imagine is to see" (Donner a voir will reiterate the<br />

surrealist!), and to see is to crystallize, to render diaphane or<br />

"transparent"; that is, imagination is not the creator <strong>of</strong> illusion,<br />

but the illuminator <strong>of</strong> reality. "Imagination, in effect, is like t<br />

soul's eye; therein forms are outlined and preserved; thereby<br />

behold the reflections <strong>of</strong> the invisible world; it is the glass o<br />

visions and the apparatus <strong>of</strong> magical life."<br />

Levi is here rendering in its typically materialist terms a conce,<br />

that had been molded by some <strong>of</strong> the major figures <strong>of</strong> the Renaissance.<br />

To the magician Giordano Bruno, writes Frances Yates,<br />

"this magically animated imagination is the 'sole gate to all internal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!