01.01.2013 Views

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, <strong>Teachings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Influence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

organisation <strong>of</strong> devotional exercises, having all served to awake <strong>and</strong><br />

keep alive the innate proselytising spirit <strong>of</strong> Islam. 1<br />

Introductory Comments<br />

Having quoted Arnold’s statement, it is still difficult to write<br />

conclusively about the extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab’s<br />

influence. This is so for the following reasons:<br />

(1) Those who are truly students <strong>and</strong> “influenced” have to be<br />

distinguished from those who are supporters <strong>and</strong> along the same path,<br />

having <strong>com</strong>e to that path independent <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-<br />

Wahhaab. This category would have to include people like<br />

<strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Ismaaeel al-Sanaani <strong>and</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Ali al-<br />

Shaukaani, both <strong>of</strong> Yemen, as well as ibn Abdul-Wahhaab’s direct<br />

teachers, such as al-Sindi, Ibrahim ibn Saif <strong>and</strong> so on. <strong>The</strong>se people<br />

are still <strong>of</strong> great importance because they agreed with ibn Abdul-<br />

Wahhaab, if not verbally then in their teachings, that this path is the<br />

one true path.<br />

(2) Those who liked some aspects <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab’s<br />

reform but were not actually truly followers, in the sense that just one<br />

aspect does not make one “influenced” especially when the entire<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> one’s teachings goes against what he said. In particular,<br />

mention will be made later <strong>of</strong> Iqbal <strong>and</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> Abduh.<br />

(3) Any time a Muslim individual, organization or group<br />

appeared that was displeasing to the colonial powers or some sectors<br />

<strong>of</strong> Muslims, they would be termed “Wahhabis,” even if they had no<br />

contact with the teachings <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab or very little in<br />

<strong>com</strong>mon with ibn Abdul-Wahhaab. This was simply a propag<strong>and</strong>a<br />

device to drive Muslims away from that movement. In some cases,<br />

there may have been no substance whatever to said claim. In other<br />

cases, the movement may have had many <strong>of</strong> the same teachings <strong>of</strong> ibn<br />

Abdul-Wahhaab, leading the people truly back to the Quran <strong>and</strong><br />

Sunnah. <strong>The</strong> question then arises: How can people be prevented from<br />

being attracted to a call that is so consistent with the clear revelations<br />

that no doubt many will accept that movement? <strong>The</strong> answer: Give that<br />

movement a name that will drive people away from it. In the past, that<br />

1 T. W. Arnold, <strong>The</strong> Preaching <strong>of</strong> Islam (Lahore: Sh. <strong>Muhammad</strong> Ashraf, 1975), p.<br />

431.<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!