01.01.2013 Views

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, <strong>Teachings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Influence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

<strong>The</strong> correct translation, using Algar’s terms, should be, “<strong>The</strong> first is<br />

that the ancients did not <strong>com</strong>mit shirk nor did they call upon the<br />

angels, sacred personages or idols except during times <strong>of</strong> ease.” 1 In<br />

fact, the remainder <strong>of</strong> the passage, especially the verses <strong>of</strong> the Quran<br />

he quotes, makes it very clear that this is what ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

said. Thus even if there were an error in Algar’s copy, its meaning is<br />

clear from the rest <strong>of</strong> the text. It cannot be known whether this<br />

<strong>com</strong>pletely faulty translation was due to a mistake in the text that he<br />

used, intentional or simply a mistake on Algar’s part. Given the tenor<br />

<strong>of</strong> his work, there is no reason, unfortunately, to assume any good<br />

intention on his part. However, it seems that Algar never gave this<br />

work <strong>of</strong> his much scholarly effort <strong>and</strong> most likely he simply<br />

mistranslated this portion (he may have been overjoyed to later find<br />

that it implied a contradiction on ibn Abdul-Wahhaab’s part). Allah<br />

knows best.<br />

It is very interesting to note that in his second appendix, a<br />

passage from Dahlaan, Dahlaan seems to be implying a tomb worship<br />

that Algar had earlier denied occurred among the Muslims. Much <strong>of</strong><br />

this passage from Dahlaan is the same false propag<strong>and</strong>a that was<br />

discussed from him in the previous chapter. Dahlaan wrote,<br />

[ibn Abdul-Wahhaab] went so far as to declare the believers<br />

unbelievers. He claimed that visiting the tomb <strong>of</strong> the Prophet—<br />

upon whom be peace <strong>and</strong> blessings—as well as appealing to him or<br />

other prophets <strong>and</strong> righteous person as intermediaries (altawassul)<br />

or visiting their tombs constituted shirk [the assignation<br />

<strong>of</strong> partners to God]. He also denounced as shirk addressing the<br />

prophets, the saints <strong>and</strong> the righteous while appealing to them, 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> attributing anything to other than God, even if by way <strong>of</strong><br />

rational metaphor. 3<br />

<strong>The</strong> last appendix <strong>and</strong> “refutation” <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

<strong>com</strong>es from the Shiite Ja’far Kashif al-Ghita. Algar opens this<br />

1 <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab, vol. 1, p. 169; Al-Ruwaishid, vol. 1, p. 283.<br />

Emphasis added.<br />

2 Emphasis added. Earlier Algar had written (p. 34, fn. 27), “It is interesting to<br />

note in passing that much nonsense has been written by Western scholars on<br />

what they term ‘tomb worship’ or ‘the worship <strong>of</strong> saints’ in the Muslim world,<br />

thus implicitly accepting the Wahhabi thesis that to visit <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer a prayer at<br />

a tomb, although not to its occupant, somehow constitutes a form <strong>of</strong> worship <strong>of</strong><br />

the tomb.” (Emphasis added.)<br />

3 Algar, p. 78.<br />

292

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!