01.01.2013 Views

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

291<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, <strong>Teachings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Influence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

to scholars such as Shaykh Ja’far Kashif al-Ghita.” 1 This is very sad<br />

indeed. Even if ibn Abdul-Wahhaab were the most evil <strong>of</strong> all people,<br />

that does not give anyone the right to lie <strong>and</strong> spread fabrications about<br />

him. This is nothing but a violation <strong>of</strong> the Islamic concept <strong>of</strong> justice<br />

<strong>and</strong> rights.<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> his work is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this<br />

present work. However, there are three appendices <strong>of</strong> interest. <strong>The</strong><br />

first is a short passage from ibn Abdul-Wahhaab’s Kashf al-<br />

Shubuhaat, the second a short passage from Dahlaan’s critique <strong>of</strong><br />

“Wahhabism,” <strong>and</strong> the third is a short passage from the Shiite Ja’far<br />

Kashif al-Ghita.<br />

He introduces ibn Abdul-Wahhaab’s writing with a short<br />

passage wherein he is very upset that <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

claimed that the Arabs at the time <strong>of</strong> Ignorance understood the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> Allah being only one God but that they had fallen into<br />

believing in intermediaries. 2 Once again, though, it seems that Algar’s<br />

true problems lie with what the verses <strong>of</strong> the Quran state <strong>and</strong> have<br />

very little to do with ibn Abdul-Wahhaab, who simply restated what is<br />

explicit in the Quran.<br />

Algar tries to show that ibn Abdul-Wahhaab contradicts<br />

himself. After quoting the passage which says that the polytheists<br />

called upon God <strong>and</strong> upon others at times <strong>of</strong> ease, Algar wrote a<br />

footnote, “This sentence seems to contradict the statement contained<br />

in the opening <strong>of</strong> the second paragraph <strong>of</strong> this extract.” 3 He is<br />

referring to the following passage—<strong>and</strong> this is Algar’s own<br />

translation—“<strong>The</strong> first is that the ancients did not, in times <strong>of</strong><br />

prosperity, assign partners to God nor did they call on angels, sacred<br />

personages (al-awliya`), <strong>and</strong> idols.” 4 <strong>The</strong> reason there is a<br />

contradiction is because Algar has totally mistranslated that passage.<br />

That passage reads,<br />

ﺀﺎﺧﺮﻟﺍ ﰲ ﻻﺇ ﷲﺍ ﻊﻣ ﻥﺎﺛﻭﻷﺍﻭ ﺀﺎﻴﻟﻭﻷﺍﻭ ﺔﻜﺋﻼﳌﺍ ﻥﻮﻋﺪﻳ ﻻﻭ ﻥﻮﻛﺮﺸﻳ ﻻ ﲔﻟﻭﻷﺍ ﻥﺃ ﺎﻫﺪﺣﺃ<br />

1 Algar, p. 39.<br />

2 Cf., Algar, p. 71.<br />

3 Algar, p. 75.<br />

4 Algar, p. 74.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!