01.01.2013 Views

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

299<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, <strong>Teachings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Influence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

forbidden <strong>and</strong> some are forbidden because they are means that may<br />

eventually lead to idolatry. His claim that all previous generations <strong>of</strong><br />

Muslims <strong>and</strong> even the Prophet (peace <strong>and</strong> blessings <strong>of</strong> Allah be upon<br />

him) himself approved <strong>of</strong> such claims is nothing but falsehood. At the<br />

very least, he should have provided at least one hadith to show that the<br />

Prophet (peace <strong>and</strong> blessings <strong>of</strong> Allah be upon him) approved <strong>of</strong> such<br />

acts.<br />

In a blatant act <strong>of</strong> lying, he states that ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

“ascribed a human form to God.” 1 This ridiculous statement is not<br />

even deserving <strong>of</strong> a <strong>com</strong>ment.<br />

He then states, “Ibn Abd al-Wahhab further condemned as<br />

unbelievers those who did not observe all the prescribed times <strong>of</strong><br />

prayer, a position absent from traditional Islam.” 2 As was noted<br />

earlier, ibn Abdul-Wahhaab himself specifically refrained from<br />

making the judgment about those who did not pray because, as he<br />

said, the scholars had differed on that issue. His statement, “a position<br />

absent from traditional Islam,” may make the reader believe that no<br />

earlier scholars held that position. Actually, some scholars have<br />

always held that position. But what he means by “traditional Islam” is<br />

actually only the traditional practices <strong>of</strong> the Sufis, whether they be<br />

ignorant or not.<br />

Schwartz also says, “He dem<strong>and</strong>ed that the Muslim pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

<strong>of</strong> faith be made a second time, as an adherent to his Wahhabi sect.” 3<br />

Again, this is pure falsehood that Schwartz does not reference<br />

whatsoever. 4<br />

Schwartz then mentions some <strong>of</strong> the acts, which in ibn Abdul-<br />

Wahhaab’s views are bidah or innovations, that ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

opposed, although he has a tendency to embellish the picture or not<br />

give the entire picture. For example, he states that ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

“condemned the habit <strong>of</strong> those making hajj in Mecca to visit the<br />

Prophet’s tomb in Medina.” 5<br />

1 Schwartz, p. 69.<br />

2 Schwartz, p. 69.<br />

3 Schwartz, p. 69.<br />

4 It is easy to write without having to reference one’s material, as then one can<br />

write whatever one wishes to write. Indeed, in that case, one can even include<br />

material from the most unreliable <strong>of</strong> sources.<br />

5 Schwartz, p. 70.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!