01.01.2013 Views

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, <strong>Teachings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Influence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

make matters worse, with what little knowledge Algar truly has <strong>of</strong> ibn<br />

Abdul-Wahhaab’s writings, he has the audacity <strong>and</strong> the arrogance to<br />

think himself capable <strong>of</strong> judging what came from ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

<strong>and</strong> what did not, with no scholarly basis for his conclusion<br />

whatsoever. Indeed, in the translation by al-Faruqi, there is no hint<br />

whatsoever that al-Faruqi added those “issues.” Algar has simply<br />

decided that such is the case—<strong>and</strong> it does not seem that important to<br />

him if such is the reality or not.<br />

Actually, Algar is aware <strong>of</strong> the collected works <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-<br />

Wahhaab. However, he never bothered to ensure that he had all the<br />

volumes. He states, “it is unclear how many volumes the <strong>com</strong>plete<br />

series <strong>com</strong>prises.” 1 He writes that he has volumes one, two <strong>and</strong> four <strong>of</strong><br />

the set. As is clear from his own statements, he actually only had<br />

volumes one <strong>and</strong> two <strong>of</strong> the collection <strong>of</strong> hadith <strong>of</strong> a legal nature by<br />

ibn Abdul-Wahhaab <strong>and</strong> another volume with it. Yet with this amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> effort, Algar thought himself qualified to write a critical essay on<br />

Wahhabism <strong>and</strong> even to declare what is or is not part <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-<br />

Wahhaab’s writings.<br />

After mentioning some <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab’s writings on<br />

pages 14 to 16, Algar still had the gall to write on page 17, “One has,<br />

indeed, the impression that <strong>Muhammad</strong> b. ‘Abd al-Wahhab regarded<br />

the authorial act as one more unauthorized innovation that for<br />

centuries had clouded the Muslim mind.” 2 Can there be a more<br />

baseless conclusion? Furthermore, writing in itself is not the only<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard to judge whether or not one is a great scholar, reformer or<br />

person <strong>of</strong> influence. In fact, Algar, who considers himself a Sufi, has<br />

decided to ignore the fact that there are many Sufis who never left<br />

much behind in the way <strong>of</strong> writings. As was mentioned earlier, ibn<br />

Abdul-Wahhaab’s true scholarship appears in his letters that he wrote.<br />

Algar seems to have no clue as to the importance or availability <strong>of</strong> that<br />

important material.<br />

Moving on with ibn Abdul-Wahhaab’s life, Algar claims that<br />

ibn Abdul-Wahhaab made his alliance with <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Saud<br />

“sealing it with another marriage.” 3 This author could not find any<br />

1 Algar, p. 16.<br />

2 Algar, p. 17.<br />

3 Algar, p. 19.<br />

284

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!