01.01.2013 Views

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, <strong>Teachings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Influence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

example, when Shaikh Khaleel Ahmad al-Suhaarnfoori 1 was asked about<br />

<strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab the Najdi <strong>and</strong> his followers, he replied that<br />

they are to be treated the same as the Khawarij. <strong>The</strong>n he quoted the same<br />

passage above from al-Shaami, that is ibn Abideen, in his Haashiyah. 2<br />

Similarly, <strong>Muhammad</strong> al-Taanuwi, in his <strong>com</strong>mentary to Sunan al-<br />

Nasaa`ee, <strong>com</strong>menting on the hadith concerning the appearance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Khawarij, quoted the entire passage above from ibn Abideen, stating that the<br />

followers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab <strong>and</strong> those in India known as<br />

the “Wahhabis” are nothing but Khawarij. 3 Husain Ahmad al-Madani 4 made<br />

the same conclusion relying virtually <strong>com</strong>pletely on ibn Abideen’s<br />

statement. 5 Another scholar who relied on ibn Abideen’s statement was<br />

Shaikh Rasheed Ahmad al-Kankoohi. 6<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> this backlash is the result <strong>of</strong> a seemingly harmless short<br />

passage in a Hanafi book <strong>of</strong> jurisprudence. This devastating result points to<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> a Muslim scholar being academically rigorous about<br />

everything that he writes or says. He must be fair, he must research <strong>and</strong> he<br />

must weigh heavily every word he says. One small passage may have long<br />

reaching effects while the author himself may have thought it not very<br />

significant <strong>and</strong> thus may have simply relied upon what he heard others say<br />

without verifying the matter for himself. Perhaps every scholar, researcher<br />

<strong>and</strong> speaker must keep in mind the hadith that may very well apply here:<br />

�ﻢ�ﻨ�ﻬ�ﺟ ﻲ�ﻓ ﺎ�ﻬﹺﺑ ﻱﹺﻮ�ﻬ�ﻳ ﹰﻻﺎ�ﺑ ﺎ�ﻬﹶﻟ ﻲ�ﻘﹾﻠ�ﻳ ﻻ �ﻪﱠﻠﻟﺍ �ﻂ�ﺨ�ﺳ �ﻦ�ﻣ �ﺔ�ﻤ�ﻠﹶﻜﹾﻟﺎﹺﺑ �ﻢﱠﻠﹶﻜ�ﺘ�ﻴﹶﻟ �ﺪ�ﺒ�ﻌﹾﻟﺍ ﱠﻥﹺﺇ<br />

1 He was a scholar <strong>of</strong> hadith who taught at Deob<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mazaahir al-Uloom. He<br />

authored a lengthy <strong>com</strong>mentary on Sunan Abi Dawood. He died in Madinah in<br />

1346 A.H.<br />

2 See the entire response from al-Suhaaranfoori in Sayid Taalib-ur-Rahmaan, Al-<br />

Diywab<strong>and</strong>iyyah: Tareefuha wa Aqaaiduha (Karachi, Pakistan: Dar al-Kitaab<br />

wa al-Sunnah, 1995), pp. 247-248. Also see Abdul-Jaleel, p. 189.<br />

3 See Abdul-Jaleel, p. 229; Taalib-ur-Rahmaan, pp. 251-252.<br />

4 Al-Madani was the leading scholar <strong>of</strong> hadith among the Deob<strong>and</strong>is after Anwar<br />

Shah al-Kashmeeri. He took an active role in freeing India from the British. He<br />

died in 1957. See Abdul-Jaleel, p. 144. For a <strong>com</strong>plete discussion <strong>of</strong> his attitude<br />

towards the teachings <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab, see Abdul-Jaleel,<br />

pp. 144-184.<br />

5 See Abdul-Jaleel, p. 170, 172, 177,178 <strong>and</strong> 179; Taalib-ur-Rahmaan,pp.252-257.<br />

6 He was the director <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Deob<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> wrote a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

books. He died in 1323 A.H. His reliance on ibn Abideen is noted in Abdul-<br />

Jaleel, p. 225. <strong>The</strong> opposition to the followers <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab reached<br />

such proportions in India that in 1926 C.E. a conference was convened in which<br />

a declaration was made against King Abdul-Aziz <strong>and</strong> a telegram was sent to<br />

the British government to ask them on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Muslims <strong>of</strong> India to use<br />

their military <strong>and</strong> political power against King Abdul-Aziz in the Hijaz. See<br />

Abdul-Jaleel, p. 28.<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!