01.01.2013 Views

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, <strong>Teachings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Influence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

belief that ziyara <strong>and</strong> tawassul is valid <strong>and</strong> beneficial were to be<br />

false, there is no logical reason for condemning the belief as<br />

entailing exclusion from Islam… 1<br />

It is difficult to know where to start with a passage like this that has so<br />

much falsehood in it. First, he claims that anyone who performs any <strong>of</strong><br />

the above-mentioned acts are mushrik (polytheist, outside <strong>of</strong> the fold<br />

<strong>of</strong> Islam) according to the “Wahhabis.” This is simply <strong>and</strong> blatantly<br />

not true. At no time, for example, did ibn Abdul-Wahhaab or any <strong>of</strong><br />

his followers declare a person a disbeliever simply because he<br />

“expected” or had “aspirations” for the prophets’ or martyrs’<br />

intercession. Similarly, there is no place in which ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

or his followers state that the visiting <strong>of</strong> a tomb or even the building <strong>of</strong><br />

a mausoleum over it is an act <strong>of</strong> shirk. <strong>The</strong> latter, for example, is<br />

simply an act that leads to shirk <strong>and</strong> was, as such, prohibited by ibn<br />

Abdul-Wahhaab as it was prohibited by the Prophet (peace <strong>and</strong><br />

blessings <strong>of</strong> Allah be upon him) before him. Did ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

or his followers declare the one who makes tawassul by mentioning<br />

the Prophet (peace <strong>and</strong> blessings <strong>of</strong> Allah be upon him) a disbeliever?<br />

On what basis is Algar making these claims? He himself <strong>of</strong>fers no<br />

references. He does not refer to any writing <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab or<br />

any <strong>of</strong> his numerous followers to support these claims.<br />

Algar says in the passage above, “All the allegedly deviant<br />

practices just listed can, however, be vindicated with reference not<br />

only to tradition <strong>and</strong> consensus 2 but also to hadith.” He is claiming<br />

that all <strong>of</strong> those acts can be justified by reference to hadith. Of course,<br />

he <strong>of</strong>fers no pro<strong>of</strong> for that. Not one hadith is quoted to support such a<br />

claim <strong>and</strong> not even one reference is given who, one could assume,<br />

provides those hadith. Is he trying to imply that there is a hadith in<br />

which the Prophet (peace <strong>and</strong> blessings <strong>of</strong> Allah be upon him) or one<br />

<strong>of</strong> his Companions sought help in a spiritual manner from someone in<br />

a grave? If a man is not careful about what he claims is found in the<br />

hadith <strong>of</strong> the Prophet (peace <strong>and</strong> blessings <strong>of</strong> Allah be upon him), it is<br />

not surprising that he is not careful in what he says about ibn Abdul-<br />

Wahhaab.<br />

1 Algar, pp. 32-34.<br />

2 How he makes the claim to consensus is yet another miracle.<br />

286

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!