01.01.2013 Views

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

247<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, <strong>Teachings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Influence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

<strong>The</strong> Allegation that ibn Abdul-Wahhaab revolted against the Ottoman<br />

Caliphate<br />

As mentioned in Chapter 2, Najd, at the time <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-<br />

Wahhaab, was not truly under the authority <strong>of</strong> the Ottoman rulers.<br />

Indeed, it had been left on its own for quite some time. It evolved into<br />

a rather lawless state with each small village or Bedouin tribe having<br />

its own ruler. <strong>The</strong>se rulers feuded <strong>and</strong> fought repeatedly with the<br />

others around them. Furthermore, when ibn Abdul-Wahhaab began his<br />

call in earnest, upon moving to al-Uyainah, he did so with the<br />

agreement <strong>and</strong> in alliance with the local ameer or established<br />

authority. Similarly, when he moved to al-Diriyyah, he made a pact<br />

with the ameer <strong>of</strong> that l<strong>and</strong> for some twenty years, <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn<br />

Saud. Hence, at no time did ibn Abdul-Wahhaab revolt against the<br />

rulers in his area. Furthermore, since Najd was never truly part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ottoman rule, he never revolted against the Ottoman rulers either. 1<br />

Even though such was the case <strong>and</strong> even though such should<br />

have been clear to those living at that time, this did not prevent the<br />

opponents from making the false claim against ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />

<strong>and</strong> his followers that they were nothing more than renegades who<br />

revolted against the legitimate authorities. Ibn Afaaliq wrote, “Your<br />

monotheism (tauheed) includes revolting against the Muslims… That<br />

is blasphemy not tauheed.” 2 As noted earlier, ibn Abideen also<br />

considered the “Wahhabis” renegades. Dahlaan, al-Amali <strong>and</strong> others<br />

also made similar claims. 3 Some, such as Abdul-Qadeem Zaloom,<br />

even blamed the “Wahhabis” for the fall <strong>of</strong> the Ottoman Empire,<br />

claiming that the British were supplying <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Saud <strong>and</strong> his<br />

son Abdul-Azeez with weapons <strong>and</strong> money. 4<br />

On this point, ibn Abdul-Wahhaab made his beliefs very clear.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are the same beliefs held by the ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamaah<br />

throughout its history. In his letter to the people <strong>of</strong> al-Qaseem, ibn<br />

Abdul-Wahhaab wrote, “I believe in the obligation to listen <strong>and</strong> obey<br />

1 True, the new state did eventually go to war against other tribes in Najd as well<br />

as against al-Ahsaa, Hijaz, Iraq <strong>and</strong> so forth, but that was all after having been<br />

attacked <strong>and</strong> being placed in a situation where the legitimate rulers were<br />

forced to defend themselves.<br />

2 Quoted in al-Abdul-Lateef, p. 233.<br />

3 Cf., al-Abdul-Lateef, p. 233.<br />

4 Cf., al-Abdul-Lateef, pp. 233-234.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!