The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com
The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com
The Life, Teachings and Influence of Muhammad ... - IslamHouse.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
223<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, <strong>Teachings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Influence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />
Wahhaab <strong>and</strong> his teachings. One <strong>of</strong> the more <strong>com</strong>prehensive works<br />
available on this topic is al-Abdul-Lateef’s Da’aawa al-Munawi`een<br />
li-Da’wah al-Shaikh <strong>Muhammad</strong> ibn Abdil-Wahhaab: Ardh wa Naqd.<br />
<strong>The</strong> topics that he discusses provide a good overview <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong><br />
allegations <strong>and</strong> criticisms made. 1 Al-Abdul-Lateef touches upon the<br />
following topics in detail:<br />
I. Blatant fabrications concerning the call <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab<br />
A. <strong>The</strong> claim that ibn Abdul-Wahhaab claimed prophethood <strong>and</strong><br />
belittled the Prophet (peace <strong>and</strong> blessings <strong>of</strong> Allah be upon him).<br />
B. <strong>The</strong> claim that ibn Abdul-Wahhaab propagated<br />
anthropomorphism. 2<br />
1 Another good but brief presentation <strong>of</strong> the points concerning which ibn Abdul-<br />
Wahhaab <strong>and</strong> his opponents differed is found in al-Ajilaan, pp. 132-161.<br />
2 For a refutation <strong>of</strong> the allegation that ibn Abdul-Wahhaab was an<br />
anthropomorphist, see ibn Sahmaan, pp. 214-277. In Chapter 3, some <strong>of</strong> ibn<br />
Abdul-Wahhaab’s beliefs concerning the names <strong>and</strong> attributes were given. In<br />
sum, he never attributes any <strong>of</strong> the attributes <strong>of</strong> human beings to Allah, which<br />
is anthropomorphism. Instead, he attributes to Allah whatever Allah <strong>and</strong> His<br />
Messenger (peace <strong>and</strong> blessings <strong>of</strong> Allah be upon him) have attributed to Him.<br />
This would include such things as Allah’s h<strong>and</strong> but the h<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Allah is<br />
<strong>com</strong>pletely different in its nature than that <strong>of</strong> human beings, as it is a h<strong>and</strong><br />
that is befitting His majesty <strong>and</strong> greatness. This view <strong>of</strong> ibn Abdul-Wahhaab is<br />
actually the view <strong>of</strong> the early <strong>and</strong> leading scholars throughout the history <strong>of</strong><br />
Islam. Only later schools ever deviated from this approach. Al-Arnaaoot wrote<br />
in the introduction to Zain al-Deen al-Maqdisi’s Aqaweel al-Thiqaat fi Taweel<br />
al-Asma wa al-Sifaat wa al-Ayaat al-Muhkimaat wa al-Mushtabihaat, a book<br />
that quotes the earliest scholars to prove that the view <strong>of</strong> the attributes <strong>of</strong><br />
Allah which is known as the salafi view is the correct view according to the<br />
Quran <strong>and</strong> sunnah, “I am certain that the one who reads this book [al-<br />
Maqdisi’s book] attentively <strong>and</strong> sincerely will have his heart <strong>and</strong> mind filled<br />
with the conviction <strong>of</strong> the correctness <strong>of</strong> the approach <strong>of</strong> the salaf concerning<br />
the attributes <strong>of</strong> Allah. It is the best, strongest <strong>and</strong> most guided approach. He<br />
[the reader] will reject, with pleasure <strong>and</strong> conviction, what has been written in<br />
the books <strong>of</strong> the later scholars that the approach <strong>of</strong> the salaf is safer but the<br />
approach <strong>of</strong> the later scholars is wiser <strong>and</strong> more intelligent. [<strong>The</strong> reader] will<br />
clearly state that the view [<strong>of</strong> the later scholars] is incorrect <strong>and</strong> goes against<br />
the guidance <strong>of</strong> the Sunnah <strong>and</strong> the Book. <strong>The</strong> correct statement based on the<br />
Prophetic Sunnah <strong>and</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Allah is that the way <strong>of</strong> the salaf is more<br />
intelligent, wisest <strong>and</strong> safest.” Shuaib al-Arnaaoot, introduction to Zain al-<br />
Deen al-Maqdisi, Aqaweel al-Thiqaat fi Taweel al-Asma wa al-Sifaat wa al-<br />
Ayaat al-Muhkamaat wa al-Mushtabihaat (Beirut: Muassasat al-Risaalah,<br />
1985), p. 8. One <strong>of</strong> the earliest examples <strong>of</strong> a person asking about these<br />
attributes <strong>and</strong> seeking an explanation for them <strong>com</strong>es from the time <strong>of</strong> Malik.<br />
A man came to him <strong>and</strong> said, “O Abu Abdullah [Imam Malik], [about the<br />
verse,] ‘Allah rose over the Throne,’ how is this rising?” Malik’s reply was, “<strong>The</strong><br />
modality <strong>of</strong> His act is not known. But His rising over the Throne is not