30.01.2013 Views

Thixoforming : Semi-solid Metal Processing

Thixoforming : Semi-solid Metal Processing

Thixoforming : Semi-solid Metal Processing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172j 6 Modelling the Flow Behaviour of <strong>Semi</strong>-<strong>solid</strong> <strong>Metal</strong> Alloys<br />

rheological measurement. Koke and Modigell [11, 12] introduced an approach to<br />

predict the influence of convective Ostwald ripening on the viscosity evolution during<br />

material preparation in a rotational rheometer. This approach is used here to<br />

eliminate particle growth from experimental results just to reflect rheological<br />

phenomena.<br />

6.1.2<br />

Mathematical Modelling of the Flow Behaviour<br />

The mathematical approach used to describe experimentally discovered flow phenomena<br />

depends on the <strong>solid</strong> fraction of the sample under investigation. <strong>Semi</strong>-<strong>solid</strong><br />

material used for thixocasting with <strong>solid</strong> fraction between 40 and 60% is described<br />

using fluid mechanics whereas material used for thixoforging with higher <strong>solid</strong><br />

fraction up to 90% requires approaches from <strong>solid</strong>-state physics [13].<br />

6.1.2.1 Approach from Fluid Mechanics<br />

It was mentioned earlier that in the semi-<strong>solid</strong> state the globular <strong>solid</strong> particles are<br />

dispersed in a liquid Newtonian matrix and consequently modelling approaches<br />

known from classical suspension rheology can be applied. In the equilibrium state,<br />

semi-<strong>solid</strong> alloys are shear-thinning and the most common descriptions are as<br />

follows:<br />

Ostwald de Waele: t ¼ kg_ n Yh ¼ kg_ n 1<br />

Herschel–Bulkley:<br />

t ¼ t0 þ kg_ n Yh ¼ t0<br />

Cross model:<br />

þ kg_ n 1<br />

g_ t ¼ t¥ þ t0 t¥<br />

1 þ kg_ nYh ¼ h ¥ þ h0 h ¥<br />

1 þ kg_ n<br />

The first two models just differ in the yield stress t0, which is a property thoroughly<br />

discussed in the literature. Barnes and Walters [14] doubt the existence of a yield<br />

stress and claim it to be the stress which cannot be measured due to device-related<br />

limits. Contrary to this, Cheng [15] defines a static and a dynamic yield stress, both of<br />

which are influenced by the internal structure of the material. In Section 6.2, recent<br />

investigations on the low-melting tin–lead alloy using creep tests at very low stresses<br />

show the necessity to distinguish between isostructural, dynamic and static yield<br />

stress. In addition to the yield stress, the models contain the consistency factor k and<br />

the flow exponent n. The stress approaches infinity for very low shear rates and zero<br />

for very high shear rates.<br />

In the Cross model, it is assumed that thixotropic fluids effectively behave like a<br />

Newtonian fluid in the case of very low or very high shear rates. The viscosity tends<br />

towards h0 for shear rates ! 0 and towards h¥ for shear rates ! ¥. Atkinson [2]<br />

fitted several experimental data for tin–lead to the Cross model but stated that<br />

experimental values at the transition to the plateau regions are sparse or even<br />

missing.<br />

To account for thixotropic effects in metallic suspensions, the common theories<br />

can be divided into three groups [2, 16]:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!