25.02.2015 Views

THESE UNIQUE El Hassane Kéhien-Piho TOU - Nutridev

THESE UNIQUE El Hassane Kéhien-Piho TOU - Nutridev

THESE UNIQUE El Hassane Kéhien-Piho TOU - Nutridev

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

E.H. Tou et al. / LWT 40 (2007) 1561–1569 1567<br />

for the organoleptic characteristics of the resulting<br />

MG-CMI gruel with possible enhancement of both the<br />

sweet and sour taste. The effect of these changes in<br />

organoleptic characteristics on the acceptability of the<br />

gruel will have to be assessed. As previously observed in<br />

the traditional fermentation process (Tou et al., 2006),<br />

the kinetics pattern indicates the same metabolic dominance<br />

of homofermentative LAB during the fermentation<br />

step (i.e. longer and higher production of lactic acid than of<br />

ethanol).<br />

3.2. Changes in microbial counts during the fermentation<br />

step in MG-T and MG-CMI processing methods<br />

The microbial composition (mesophilic aerobic bacteria<br />

(MAB), yeasts, LAB and (ALAB) of fermented pastes was<br />

analysed during the fermentation step (Table 2).<br />

The number of MAB and LAB increased slowly during<br />

fermentation in both processing methods, whereas yeast<br />

counts were lower and more variable with a decrease at the<br />

end of the fermentation. Similar microbiota characteristics<br />

were reported in fermented pearl millet porridge by Thaoge<br />

et al. (2003). In all processing methods, LAB were the<br />

dominant microflora and their number increased during<br />

fermentation in all samples of MG-T and MG-CMI, to<br />

reach final values of 8.83 and 8.79 log CFU/ml, respectively.<br />

Surprisingly, the lactic microflora counts were<br />

similar in both MG-T and MG-CMI pastes in the early<br />

stage of fermentation despite the fact that inoculation by<br />

backslopping was introduced in the MG-CMI processing<br />

method. This could be due to the fact that backslop<br />

inoculation enabled the microflora in MG-CMI paste to be<br />

restored to the same level as the microflora in the MG-T<br />

paste. It is interesting to note that in the MG-T processing<br />

method, the ALAB/LAB ratio decreased during fermentation,<br />

whereas in the MG-CMI processing method it<br />

remained of the same order of magnitude from the onset<br />

to the end of fermentation. One possible explanation is that<br />

in the MG-CMI process, pre-cooking before fermentation<br />

gelatinizes starch, which is a substrate for ALAB.<br />

3.3. Nutritional value of final gruels<br />

3.3.1. Proximate composition<br />

The proximate composition of MG-T and MG-CMI<br />

gruels was similar (Table 3). As expected, the incorporation<br />

of groundnuts into the pearl millet before fermentation<br />

enables a substantial increase in protein and lipid contents<br />

and DM energy value which meet recent recommendations<br />

for complementary foods (Lutter & Dewey, 2003). These<br />

results are consistent with other studies that have shown<br />

improvement of the nutritional balance of traditional<br />

fermented foods by incorporation of protein-rich materials<br />

such as grain legumes (Sanni et al., 1999; Egounlety, 2002;<br />

Table 2<br />

Changes in microbial counts in MG-T and MG-CMI pastes during fermentation<br />

Microbial numbers (log CFU/ml)<br />

MG-T<br />

MG-CMI<br />

Fermentation time (h) 0 4 8 24 0 4 8 24<br />

MAB 8.36 8.66 8.71 8.87 8.18 8.49 8.60 8.81<br />

Yeasts 6.32 6.80 6.20 5.81 6.00 6.73 6.59 5.86<br />

LAB 8.26 8.58 8.65 8.83 8.15 8.43 8.60 8.79<br />

Ratio LAB/Yeasts 86 60 281 1046 140 50 102 835<br />

ALAB 7.04 6.77 6.48 6.40 6.79 6.62 7.18 6.97<br />

Ratio ALAB/LAB 0.06 0.02 0.007 0.004 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.02<br />

MAB: mesophilic aerobic bacteria; LAB: lactic acid bacteria; ALAB: amylolytic lactic acid bacteria.<br />

Table 3<br />

Proximate composition and phytate content of raw materials and fermented gruels (results are expressed for 100 g of dry matter)<br />

Raw materials<br />

Millet (M) Groundnut (G) Formula (M/G/<br />

Sugar: 65/20/15)<br />

Sweetened gruel (taking the addition of 15% of sugar into<br />

account)<br />

Traditional bensaalga<br />

MG-T MG-CMI<br />

a<br />

Energy (kcal) 409.2 631.7 452.2 407.7 462.5 458.2<br />

Protein (g) 8.4 29.3 11.3 7.070.7 11.670.3 11.770.1<br />

Fat (g) 5.6 52.9 14.2 4.070.7 14.570.5 14.670.6<br />

Carbohydrates (g) 81.3 9.6 69.8 86.071.7 71.470.1 70.070.1<br />

Fibre (g) 3.4 5.8 3.4 1.870.4 1.170.1 2.470.1<br />

Ash (g) 1.3 2.4 1.3 1.270.2 1.470.1 1.370.1<br />

Phytate (mg) 546 832 604 192797 388720 297730<br />

a Lestienne (2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!