25.02.2015 Views

THESE UNIQUE El Hassane Kéhien-Piho TOU - Nutridev

THESE UNIQUE El Hassane Kéhien-Piho TOU - Nutridev

THESE UNIQUE El Hassane Kéhien-Piho TOU - Nutridev

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

2,3<br />

3,5<br />

5,1<br />

3,9,1<br />

3,10,2<br />

6,9<br />

4,11,1<br />

4,11,2<br />

7,3,2<br />

1,10<br />

2,17,1<br />

1,5,2<br />

4,8,2<br />

11,11,1<br />

3,7<br />

3,10,1<br />

11,4<br />

3,6<br />

1,9<br />

6,6,2<br />

4,10<br />

1,5,1<br />

5,4,1<br />

5,4,2<br />

1,6<br />

10,9<br />

4,6<br />

4,7,1<br />

4,7,2<br />

7,9,2<br />

5,11<br />

12,11<br />

1,7,2<br />

4,9<br />

7,9,1<br />

6,10,2<br />

10,2<br />

10,4<br />

11,3<br />

11,5,1<br />

11,6,1<br />

11,10<br />

11,2<br />

8,4<br />

6,3<br />

6,4,1<br />

6,5,2<br />

6,5,1<br />

5,10<br />

2,9<br />

5,3,1<br />

4,1<br />

4,3<br />

4,4<br />

4,2<br />

5,9<br />

5,8<br />

2,2<br />

2,11,2<br />

2,12<br />

2,11,1<br />

7,8,1<br />

2,4,1<br />

2,13<br />

7,10<br />

10,8<br />

8,9<br />

8,12<br />

9,10<br />

9,2<br />

9,11<br />

10,10<br />

9,4<br />

8,1,2<br />

7,2<br />

9,6<br />

12,6<br />

8,1,1<br />

8,5,1<br />

9,1<br />

9,3,1<br />

9,3,2<br />

7,11<br />

9,5,2<br />

8,8<br />

10,3,2<br />

8,7<br />

8,10,2<br />

8,10,1<br />

7,5,1<br />

12,4,2<br />

12,8,1<br />

12,9<br />

12,3<br />

12,1<br />

9,7<br />

9,12<br />

5,6,2<br />

7,1<br />

5,6,1<br />

12,10<br />

Microbial diversity of Ben-saalga, a pearl-millet based fermented gruel from Burkina Faso<br />

Guyot Jean-Pierre 1 , Tou <strong>El</strong> <strong>Hassane</strong> 2 , Sifer Mehdi 1 , Galissaires Lydia 1 ,Icard- Vernière Christèle 1 , Mouquet-Rivier Claire 1<br />

(1) IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement)UR106 « Nutrition, Alimentation, Sociétés », Montpellier/France; (2) Université de Ouagadougou, CRSBAN, Burkina Faso<br />

Introduction<br />

Bensaalga is a popular gruel in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Its<br />

production involves different steps, mainly soaking of the grains,<br />

milling, settling of the resulting slurry and cooking. During the settling<br />

step a lactic acid fermentation occurs.<br />

It is frequently given to young children as complementary food to<br />

breast feeding. Unfortunately, this type of gruel lack of the necessary<br />

functional properties to fulfil their particular nutritional requirements,<br />

and ways of improvement must be investigated.<br />

First, one major challenge is to understand the relationships between<br />

microbial diversity and characteristics of the foodstuff.<br />

Nei and Li dissimilarity index<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

28*27<br />

12*6<br />

C.D2<br />

17*28<br />

CD3.<br />

16*16<br />

12*63<br />

9*27P<br />

29*18<br />

17*28<br />

Grouping of TSPU based on PCR-DGGE patterns<br />

Diversity of lactobacilli based on fermentation patterns<br />

1.1<br />

12HC<br />

13*26<br />

CD11<br />

CD2.<br />

CD1.<br />

CD1.<br />

CD2.<br />

CD1.<br />

CD3.<br />

14*14<br />

CD21<br />

28*56<br />

CD3.<br />

CD3.<br />

CD1.<br />

6*27P<br />

3,4<br />

4,8,1<br />

1,4<br />

7,4<br />

6,1<br />

2,7,2<br />

11,1<br />

3,1<br />

3,8<br />

6,7<br />

2,5<br />

1,1<br />

5,7<br />

4,5<br />

1,8<br />

3,3<br />

1,2<br />

5,2<br />

2,1<br />

2,6<br />

8,6<br />

7,7<br />

8,11<br />

7,6<br />

8,3<br />

1.2<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

B<br />

cluster 1<br />

cluster 2<br />

A<br />

56% similarity<br />

Results<br />

microbial diversity<br />

[7.5-8.5] logCFU/g D.M.<br />

174 isolates<br />

LAB: 92% ; lactobacilli 73%<br />

5.2% Bacillus-like<br />

1.1% Gram (+), catalase+ cocci<br />

1.7% Gram (-) bacilli<br />

Community analysis by DGGE<br />

•Common core of microbial diversity<br />

between TSPU : 56% similarity<br />

•Estimated total diversity :<br />

21 “DGGE-bands” 19 species<br />

•Estimated diversity/TSPU:<br />

10 sp./TSPU (min 6-max 14)<br />

•Occurrence of 28% of “species” ≥ 50% of<br />

TSPU<br />

metabolic diversity of lactobacilli<br />

heterofermentative<br />

(except 2)<br />

70% of the lactobacilli<br />

hetero/homo-fermentative<br />

60% similarity<br />

all homofermentative (42 strains)<br />

A survey allowed to identified 93 traditional small-scale<br />

production units (TSPU) in Ouagadougou from which 12 were<br />

randomly selected in order to study the microbiota of the<br />

fermented slurry.<br />

174 isolates were characterised using biochemical tests.<br />

Statistical analysis was based on the dissimilarity coefficient<br />

of Nei and Li to establish a distance matrix that is used for<br />

UPGMA. This procedure was applied for the analysis of<br />

DGGE patterns and fermentation tests.<br />

19 species<br />

Lb fermentum-like<br />

30.5%<br />

Pc pentosaceus<br />

12 %<br />

Lb plantarum<br />

14 %<br />

LAB diversity based on phenotypic characters<br />

Distribution of LAB metabolic groups between TSPU<br />

Conclusion<br />

Lb fermentum-like<br />

Lb plantarum<br />

Pc pentosaceus<br />

Lb curvatus<br />

Pc acidilactici<br />

Lb brevis<br />

Lb pentosus<br />

Lc lactis<br />

Lb salivarius<br />

Pc damnosus<br />

Lb acidophilus<br />

Lb collinoides<br />

Ln mes.mes<br />

Lb delbruecki<br />

Lb buchneri<br />

Lc raffinolactis<br />

Pc spp<br />

Ln lactis<br />

Percentage of LAB and lactobacilli able to hydrolyse<br />

starch and antinutritional factors (phytate and raffinose) :<br />

STARCH<br />

PHYTATE (IP6)<br />

RAFFINOSE<br />

?<br />

heterofermentative<br />

lactobacilli<br />

“dominated TSPU”<br />

42%<br />

10<br />

11<br />

%total LAB<br />

9<br />

9.7<br />

23.2<br />

56.5<br />

12<br />

8<br />

% of total LAB population<br />

heterolactic homolactic<br />

Lactobacilli Lactobacilli<br />

3.2<br />

3.7<br />

14.7<br />

39.2<br />

10.3<br />

‣ the traditional production units can be grouped according to<br />

their DGGE pattern<br />

‣ DGGE estimate of diversity is consistent with determination<br />

based on phenotypic characters<br />

‣ only a few species/TSPU BUT a large metabolic diversity<br />

‣ lactobacilli are dominant with Lb. fermentum and Lb. plantarum<br />

‣ starch hydrolysis potential evenly distributed between hetero<br />

and homofermentative lactobacilli<br />

‣ higher potential for phytate and raffinose fermentation with<br />

heterofermentative lactobacilli<br />

‣ homo vs. hetero TSPU : a reality or a bias due to the size of<br />

sampling ?<br />

100.0<br />

80.0<br />

60.0<br />

40.0<br />

20.0<br />

0.0<br />

% heterofermentative lactob./PU<br />

% homofermentative lactob./PU<br />

% cocci/PU<br />

1<br />

7<br />

2<br />

6<br />

homofermentative<br />

lactobacilli<br />

“dominated TSPU”<br />

3 50%<br />

5<br />

4<br />

2.1<br />

nstitut de recherche<br />

our le développement<br />

FOODMICRO 2006, Bologna, Italy, August 2006<br />

5th International ICFMH Symposium<br />

Acknowledgment : this work was funded by<br />

the European Commission<br />

contract N° ICA4-CT-2002-10047<br />

(www.mpl.ird.fr/cerefer/)<br />

CEREFER

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!