Proefschrift Crisis in aantocht! - Onderzoek - Hogeschool Utrecht
Proefschrift Crisis in aantocht! - Onderzoek - Hogeschool Utrecht
Proefschrift Crisis in aantocht! - Onderzoek - Hogeschool Utrecht
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
– Bouwman, L., te Molder, H., Koelen, M., & van Woerkum, C. (2009).<br />
I eat healthfully but I am not a freak. Consumers’ everyday life perspective<br />
on healthful eat<strong>in</strong>g. Appetite 53, p.390-398.<br />
– Bovens, M.A.P (1990). Verantwoordelijkheid en organisatie, Beschouw<strong>in</strong>gen<br />
over aansprakelijkheid, <strong>in</strong>stitutioneel burgerschap en ambtelijke<br />
ongehoorzaamheid. Zwolle: Tjeenk Will<strong>in</strong>k.<br />
– Bovens, M.A.P., ’t Hart, P. (1996). Understand<strong>in</strong>g Policy Fiascoes,<br />
New Brunswick: Transaction.<br />
– Bovens, M.A.P. ’t Hart, P. & Guy Peters, B. (2001). Success and Failure <strong>in</strong> Public<br />
Governance, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.<br />
– Br<strong>in</strong>k, G, van den, (2002). Mondiger of moediger, Een studie naar de politieke<br />
habitas van hedendaagse burgers, Den Haag: SDU uitgevers.<br />
– Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists.<br />
– and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />
– Coll<strong>in</strong>s, H.M. and Evans, R.J. (2002). The Third Wave of Science Studies:<br />
Studies of Expertise and Experience, Social Studies of Sciences; SAGE.<br />
– Commissie Toekomst Overheidscommunicatie, (2001). In dienst van<br />
de democratie, Den Haag.<br />
– Coombs, W. Timothy & Holladay, S. J. (eds). (2010). The Handbook of <strong>Crisis</strong><br />
Communication. Blackwell Publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
– Devane, T, Holman, P. (1999). The change Handbook, Group methods for<br />
shap<strong>in</strong>g the future, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.<br />
– Dewulf, A. (2005). Issue Fram<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Multi-Actor Contexts, How people make<br />
sense of issues through negotiat<strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>g, enact<strong>in</strong>g discourse and do<strong>in</strong>g<br />
difference, Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit.<br />
– Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen,<br />
R., et al. (2009). Disentangl<strong>in</strong>g approaches to fram<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> conflict and<br />
negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations,<br />
62(2), 155-193.<br />
– Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1983). Risk and culture: an essay on the<br />
selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University<br />
of California Press.<br />
– Eder, K. (2000). Tam<strong>in</strong>g risks through dialogues: the rationality and<br />
functionality of discursive <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> risk society’ <strong>in</strong> M. Cohen,<br />
Risk <strong>in</strong> the modern age: Social Theory, Science and Environmental<br />
Decision-Mak<strong>in</strong>g, Bas<strong>in</strong>gstoke: Macmillan, p.225-48.<br />
– Edwards, D. (1998) The relevant th<strong>in</strong>g about her: social identity categories<br />
<strong>in</strong> use In: Charles Antaki, Sue Widdicombe, eds. Identities <strong>in</strong> talk. London:<br />
Sage: 15-33.<br />
171