Proefschrift Crisis in aantocht! - Onderzoek - Hogeschool Utrecht

– te Molder, H.F.M. & Gutteling, J. (2003). The issue of food genomics: About
reluctant citizens and united experts. In: R. van Est, L. Hanssen en O. Crapels
(Eds.), Genes for your food – Food for your genes. Societal issues and dilemmas
in food genomics (p.117-128). The Hague: Rathenau Institute.
Working document 92.
– te Molder, H. F.M. (2009). Discourse theory and analysis. In: S.W. Littlejohn
& K. Foss (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of Communication Theory, pp. 312-317.
London: Sage.
– Peretti-Watel, P. La societe du risqué. Paris: La Decouverte/Reperes, 2001.
– Putnam, L.L., Fairhurst, G.T., & Jablin F.M. (2001). Discourse analysis in
organizations: Issues and concerns in The New Handbook of Organizational
Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods, (p.231-269).
London: SAGE.
– Rogers, R.W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals
and attitude change: A Revised theory of protection motivation.
In J. Cacioppo & R. Petty (Eds.), Social Psychophysiology, (p.153-176).
New York: Guildford Press.
– Reynolds B. & Seeger, M.W. (2005). Crisis and emercency risk communication
as an integrative model, Journal of Health Communication, 1045-55.
– Renn, O. (1992). Concepts of Risk, A classification. Londen: Westport.
– Russell, J.A. (1991). Culture and the categorization of emotions. Psychological
Bulletin, 110, 426-450.
– Sacks, H., (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in
sequences in conversation, University of Californie, in Button, G & Lee,
I.R.E.; Talk and social organisation, Clevedon: Philadelphia p.54-70.
– Sarangi S.& Candlin, C. (2003). Categorization and explanation of risk:
a discourse analytical perspective, Health, Risk & Society, 5, (2), 115-124.
– Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis,
13, 675-682.
– Slovic, P. (1999). Trust Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the
Riskassesment Battlefield, Risk Analysis, 19 (4) 689-701.
– Starr, C. (1969). Social benefit versus technological risk, Science, 165, 232-1238.
– Stekelenburg Van, J. Promoting or preventing social change. Instrumentality,
identity, ideology and groups-based anger as motives of protest participation,
Ph.D. Faculty of Psychology and Pedagogic, VU University Amsterdam.
Amsterdam: Ridderprint, 2006.
– Sneijder, P.W.J.; Molder, H.F.M. te (2009) Normalizing ideological food choice
and eating practices: identity work in online discussions on veganism
Appetite 52. – p.621-630.
– Sneijder, P.W.J. (2006). Food for Talk: Discursive identities, food choice
and eating practices, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wageningen
Universiteit.
176