376Teresa Kosicka, Hanna Kara-Perznych obserwowanych podczas terapii tymi lekami wporównaniu z innymi dotychczas stosowanymi antagonistamikanałów wapniowych.Piśmiennictwo1. Berdeaux A.: Dihydropyridines from the first to the fourthgeneration: better effects and safety. Therapie. 2003, 58, 4,333–339.2. Celentano A., Crivaro M., Perticone F. i wsp.: Antihypertensiveeffect of manidipine: 24 hours monitoring evaluationand Doppler-echocardiographic remarks. BloodPress., 1996, 5 Suppl. 5, 29–35.3. Watanabe H.: Block of T-type calcium channel by dihydropyridinecalcium antagonist. Teikyo Medical Journal. 2003,26, 6, 425–433.4. Herbette L.G., Vecchiarelli M., Sartani A. i wsp.: Lercanidipine:short plasma half-life, long duration of action and highcholesterol tolerance: updated molecular model to rationalizeits pharmacokinetic properties. Blood Press., 1998, 7 Suppl.2, 10–7.5. Masumoto K., Takeyasu A., Oizumi K. i wsp.: Studies ofnovel 1,4-dihydropyridine Ca antagonist CS-905. I: measurementof partition coefficient (logP) by high perfomanceliquid chromatography (HPLC). Yakugaku Zasshi. 1995, 115,3, 213–220.6. van der Lee R., Pfaffendorf M., van Zwieten P.A. i wsp.: Thedifferential time courses of the vasodilator effects of various1,4-dihydropyridines in isolated human small arteries are correlatedto their lipophilicity. J. Hypertens., 2000, 18, 11,1677–1682.7. Tikhonoff F., Mazza A., Casiglia E. i wsp.: Different effectsof manidipine and lercanidipine on blood pressure, peripheralcirculation and ankle oedema in hypertensive patients [abstract].14th European Meeting on Hypertension, 2004 Jun.13–17, Paris.8. Seravalle G, Stella ML, Foglia G. i wsp.: Temporal profile ofantihypertensive drug-induced regression of cardiac and vascularstructural alterations in hypertension [abstract no.P0780]. J. Hypertens., 2002;20 Suppl.4:S190-191.9. Fogari R., Zoppi A., Mugellini A. i wsp.: Effect of low-dosemanidipine on ambulatory blood pressure in very elderlyhypertensives. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther., 1999, 13, 243–248.10. Cavallini A., Terzi G.: Effects of antihypertensive therapywith lercanidipine and verapamil on cardiac electrical activityin patients with hypertension: a randomized, double-blind pilotstudy. Curr. Ther. Resp., 2000, 61, 7, 477–487.11. Fogari R., Mugellini A., Zoppi A. i wsp.: Effect of manidipineand lisinopril on albuminuria and ventricular mass in diabetichypertensive patients with microalbuminuria [abstractno. P0209]. J. Hypertens., 2002, 20 Suppl. 4, 56.12. Sanchez A., Sayans R., Alvarez J.L. i wsp.: Left ventricularhypertrophy regression after a short antihypertensive treatmentwith lercanidipine vs enalapril [abstract no. 12]. FourthEuropean Meeting on Calcium Antagonists, 1999 Oct 27–29;Amsterdam.13. Fogari R., Mugellini A., Corradi L. i wsp.: Efficacy of lercanidipinevs losartan on left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensivetype 2 diabetic patients [abstract no. P1.191].J. Hypertens., 2000, 18 Suppl. 2, S65.14. Nakaya H., Hattori Y., Nakao Y. i wsp.: Cardiac versus vasculareffect of a new dihydropyridine derivative, CV-4093.Eur. J. Pharmacol., 1988, 146, 1, 35–43.15. Angelico P., Guarneri L., Leonardi A. i wsp.: Vascularselectiveeffect of lercanidipine and other 1,4-dihydropyridinesin isolated rabbit tissues. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 1999,51, 709–714.16. Sironi G., Colombo D., Greto L. iwsp.: Antihypertensive activityof lercanidipine and enantiomers in animal models.J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., 1997, 29 Suppl. 1, S33–40.17. Hayashi K., Ozawa Y., Fujiwara K. i wsp.: Role of actions ofcalcium antagonists on efferent arterioles, with special referencesto glomerular hypertension. Am. J. Nephrol., 2003, 23,229–244.18. Sabbatini M., Leonardi A., Testa R. i wsp.: Effect of calciumantagonists on glomerular arterioles in spontaneously hypertensiverats. Hypertension, 2000, 35, 775–779.19. Sabbatini M., Leonardi A., Testa R. i wsp: Effects of dihydropyridine-typeCa2+ antagonists on the renal arterial tree inspontaneously hypertensive rats. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.,2002, 39, 1, 39–48.20. Kobayashi S., Hishida A.: Effects of calcium antagonists,manidipine, on progressive renal injury associated with mildhypertension in remmant kidneys. J. Lab. Clin. Med., 1995,125, 572–580.21. Reams G.P., Villarreal D., Wu Z. i wsp.: An evaluation of therenal protective effect of manidipine in the uninephrectomizedspontaneously hypertensive rat. Am. Heart. J., 1993,125, 2, 620–625.22. Martinez-Martin F.J., Saiz-Satjes M.: Addition of manidipinein type 2 diabetic patients with uncontrolled hypertension andmicroalbuminuria: the AMANDHA trial [abstract no.P2.334]. J. Hypertens., 2004, 22 Suppl. 245.23. Kanda T., Hayashi K., Ozawa Y. i wsp.: Role of T-type calciumchannels as a determinant of glomerular microcirculationand subsequent renal protection [abstract no. P0170].J. Hypertens., 2002, 20 Suppl. 4, S48.24. Rachmani R., Levi Z., Zadok B.S. i wsp.: Losartan and lercanidipineattenuate low-density lipoprotein oxidation in patientswith hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomizedprospective crossover study. Clin. Pharmacol.Ther., 2002, 72, 3, 302–307.25. Bellingieri G., Mazzaglia G., Savica V. i wsp.: Effect of manidipineand nifedipine on blood pressure and renal functionin patients with chronic renal failure: a multicenter randomizedcontrolled trial. Ren. Fail., 2003, 5, 5, 681–689.26. Robles NR, Ocon J, Gomez CF, Manjon M, Pastor L, HerreraJ. i wsp.: Lercanidipine in patients with chronic renal failure:the ZAFRA study. Ren. Fail., 2005, 27, 1, 73–80.27. Saku K., Zhang B., Hirata K. i wsp.: Effects of manidipineand delapril on serum lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteinsin patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension: a randomizedtrial with one-year follow-up. Clin. Ther., 1992, 14,6, 813–820.28. Suzuki S., Ohtomo M, Satoh Y. i wsp.: Effect of manidipineand delapril on insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patientswith essential hypertension. Diabetes. Res. Clin. Pract., 1996,33, 43–51.29. Kohlmann O.J., Ribeiro A.B.: Manidipine in the treatment ofstage I and II essential hypertension patients with overweightor android obesity: a Brazilian multicentre study of efficacy,tolerabillity and metabolic effects. Arq. Bras. Cardiol., 2001,77, 5, 463–470.30. Notarbartolo A., Rengo F., Scafidi V. i wsp.: Long-term effectsof lercanidipine on the lipoprotein and apolipoproteinprofile of patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.Curr. Ther. Res., 1999, 69, 4, 228–236.
Nowe leki przeciwnadciśnieniowe z grupy antagonistów kanałów wapniowych (A-Ca 2+ ) 37731. Iimura O., Shimamoto K., Masuda A. i wsp.: Effect of calciumchannel blocker, manidipine, on insulin sensitivity inessential hypertensives. J. Diabetes Complications. 1995, 9,4, 215–219.32. Ueshiba H., Miyachi Y.: Effects of manidipine hydrochlorideon steroid hormones and insulin in hypertensive patients withobesity. Ther. Res., 2002, 23, 10, 2071–2076.33. Viviani G.L.: Lercanidipine in type 2 diabetic patients withmild to moderate arterial hypertension. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.,2002, 40, 1, 133–139.34. Roth M., Keul R., Perruchoud A.P. i wsp.: Manidipine affectsrPDF-BB-induced gene transcription of low-density lipoproteinreceptors and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzymeA reductase in human mesangial cells. Am. Heart J., 1993,125, 598–603.35. 35. Canavesi M, Baldini N, Leonardi A, Sironi G, Bellosta S,Bernini F.: In vitro inhibitory effect of lercanidipine on cholesterolaccumulation and matrix metalloproteinases secretionby macrophages. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., 2004, 44, 4,416–422.36. Corsini A, Accomazzo MR, Canavesi M. i wsp.: The newcalcium antagonist lercanidipine and its enantiomers effectmajor processes of atherogenesis in vitro: is calcium entry involved? Blood Press., 1998, 2, 18–22.37. Calo L.A., Zaghetto F., Pagnin E. i wsp.: Effects of manidipineon gene expression and protein level of oxidative stressrelatedproteins: p22phox and HO-1. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.,2004, 43, 4, 531–538.38. Taddei S., Virdis A., Ghiadoni L., Versari D., Salvetti G.,Magagna A., Salvetti A.: Calcium antagonist treatment bylercanidipine prevents hyperpolarisation in essential hypertension.Hypertension, 2003, 41, 4, 950–955.39. Cominacini L, Fratta-Pasini A, Garbin U, Pastorino AM, DavoliA, Nava C i wsp.: Antioxidant activity of different dihydropyridines.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2003, 302,4, 679–684.40. Fogari R., Zoppi A., Corradi L. i wsp: Effects of different dihydropyridinecalcium antagonists on plasma norepinephrinein essential hypertension. J. Hypertens., 2000, 18, 1871–1875.41. Grassi G., Seravalle G., Turri C. i wsp.: Short- versus longtermeffects of different dihydropyridines on sympathetic andbaroreflex function in hypertension. Hypertension. 2003, 41,3, 558–562.42. Del Vecchio L, Pozzi M, Salvetti A. i wsp.: Efficacy and tolerabilityof manidipine in the treatment of hypertension inpatients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease withoutglomerular disease: prospective, randomized, double-blindstudy of parallel groups in comparison with enalapril.J. Nephrol., 2004, 17, 261–269.43. Romito R., Pansini M.I., Perticone F., Antonelli G., PitzalisM., Rizzon P.: Comparitive effect of lercanidipine, felodipine,and nifedipine GITS on blood pressure and heart rate inpatients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension: the Lercanidipinein Adults (LEAD) Study. J. Clin. Hypertens.,2003, 5, 4, 249–253.44. Barrios V., Navarro A., Esteras A. i wsp.: Antihypertensiveefficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine in daily clinical practise.The ELYPSE study. Blood Press., 2002, 11, 2, 95–100.45. Schwinger R.H.G., Schmidt-Mertens A.: The new lipophiliccalcium channel blocker lercanidipine combines high antihypertensiveefficacy with low side effects [abstract no. P1-7].Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr., 2002, 127 Suppl.1, S13.46. Fogari R., Mugellini A., Zoppi A. i wsp.: Differential effectsof lercanidipine and nifedipine GITS on plasma norepinephrinein chronic treatment of hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens.,2003, 16, 7, 596–599.47. Casiglia E, Mazza A, Tikhonoff V, Basso G, Martini B,Scarpa R, Pessina AC.: Therapeutic profile of manidipine andlercanidipine in hypertensive patients. Adv. Ther., 2004, 21,6, 357–369.48. Pedrinelli R., Dell’Omo G., Nuti M., Menegato A., BalbariniA., Mariani M.: Heterogeneous effect of calcium antagonistson leg oedema: a comparison of amlodipine versus lercanidipinein hypertensive patients. Hypertens., 2003, 21, 10, 1969–1973.49. Borghi C., Prandin M.G., Dormi A., Ambrosioni E.: Improvedtolerability of the dihydropyridine calcium-channelantagonist lercanidipine: the lercanidipine challenge trial.Blood. Press., Suppl., 2003;Suppl 1, 14–21.50. Millar-Craig M, Shaffu B, Greenough A, Mitchell L, McDonaldC.: Lercanidipine vs lacidipine in isolated systolic hypertension.J. Human. Hypertens., 2003, 17, 11, 799–806.51. Cherubini A., Fabris F., Ferrari E., Cucinotta D., Incalzi R.A.,Senin U.: Comparative effects of lercanidipine, lacidipine,and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system on bloodpressure and heart rate in elderly hypertensive patients: theELderly and LEcarnidipine (ELLE) study. Arch. Gerontol.Geriatr., 2003, 37, 203–212.52. Poncelet P., Ribstein J., Goullard L., Bassous M., Gres C.S.,Clerson P.: Efficacy and acceptability of lercanidipine are notage dependent in patients with essential hypertension: theAGATE study. Ann. Cardiol. Angeiol., 2004, 53, 3, 123–130.53. Fogari R., Zoppi A., Lusardi P. i wsp.: Evaluation by 24-hambulatory blood pressure monitoring of efficacy of manidipinehydrochloride 10, 20 or 40 mg once daily as comparedto placebo in treating mild-to-moderate essential hypertension:a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebocontrolledstudy. Blood Press., 1996, 5, S16–23.54. Fogari R., Zoppi A., Lusardi P. i wsp.: Efficacy and tolerabilityof manidipine hydrochloride in the long-term treatmentof mild-to-moderate hypertension. Blood Press., 1996, 5,S24–28.55. Ogihara T., Nakagawa M., Ishikawa H. i wsp: Effect of manidipine,a novel calcium channel blocker, on quality of lifein hypertensive patients. Blood Press., 1992, 3, S135–139.56. Zanchetti A., Omboni S., Commare P. i wsp.: Efficacy, tolerabilityand impact on quality of life and long-term treatmentwith manidipine or amlodipine in patients with essentialhypertension. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., 2001, 38, 642–650.57. Kaneko Y., Fukiyama K., Iimura O. i wsp.: Clinical study ofmanidipine hydrochloride in essential hypertension: a doubleblindcontrolled study with nicardipine hydrochloride.J. Clin. Exp. Med., 1989, 151, 8, 471–492.58. Ogihara T.: Practitioner’s trial on the efficacy of AntihypertensiveTreatment in the Elderly-Hypertension (the PATE-Hypertension study) in Japan. Am. J. Hypertens., 2000, 13, 5,461–467.59. Nagasawa K., Kitamoto K., Nagasawa T.: A 3-year longtermevaluation of the efficacy and safety of manidipine hydrochloride(Calslot tablet) in the elderly patients with essentialhypertension: a multicenter collaborative study. RinshoKetsueki, 1997, 74, 10, 2630–2638.60. Zanchetti A.: Emerging data on calcium-channel blockers:the COHORT study. Clin. Cardiol., 2003, 26, 2 Suppl 2,II17–20.
- Page 2 and 3:
REDAKTOR NACZELNYEDITOR IN CHIEFpro
- Page 4 and 5:
312Bartosz Sokół i innipodpotylic
- Page 8 and 9:
316Anna Bryl i inniNadmierna stymul
- Page 10 and 11: 318Anna Bryl i inniTab. 1. Wskaźni
- Page 12 and 13: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 320-3
- Page 14 and 15: 322Łukasz Bartkowiak i innikrotnie
- Page 16 and 17: 324Patrycja Gula, Wojmir Ziętkowia
- Page 18 and 19: 326Patrycja Gula, Wojmir Ziętkowia
- Page 20 and 21: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 328-3
- Page 22 and 23: 330Krystyna Przybyłowska i inniWyk
- Page 24 and 25: 332Krystyna Przybyłowska i inniBre
- Page 26 and 27: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 334-3
- Page 28 and 29: 336Teresa Seidler, Milena GryzaTabe
- Page 30 and 31: 338Teresa Seidler, Milena Gryzaspo
- Page 32 and 33: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 340-3
- Page 34 and 35: 342Barbara Stawińska-Witoszyńska
- Page 36 and 37: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 344-3
- Page 38 and 39: 346Irena Maniecka-Bryła, Marek Bry
- Page 40 and 41: 348Irena Maniecka-Bryła, Marek Bry
- Page 42 and 43: 350Irena Maniecka-Bryła, Marek Bry
- Page 44 and 45: 352Wojciech Kapała, Jerzy Skrobisz
- Page 46 and 47: 354Wojciech Kapała, Jerzy Skrobisz
- Page 48 and 49: 356Wojciech Kapała, Jerzy Skrobisz
- Page 50 and 51: 358Wojciech Kapała, Jerzy Skrobisz
- Page 52 and 53: 368Wiesław Kalupanych nie przejawi
- Page 54 and 55: 370Wiesław Kalupa20018016014012010
- Page 56 and 57: 372Teresa Kosicka, Hanna Kara-PerzI
- Page 58 and 59: 374Teresa Kosicka, Hanna Kara-Perz
- Page 62 and 63: 2Teresa Kosicka, Hanna Kara-Perz
- Page 64 and 65: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 378-3
- Page 66 and 67: Agnieszka Wyrwińska i inni 380minu
- Page 68 and 69: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 382-3
- Page 70 and 71: Beata Kosińska 384ocena endoskopow
- Page 72 and 73: Beata Kosińska 386ty białek osocz
- Page 74 and 75: Beata Kosińska 38821. Frewin R.J.,
- Page 76 and 77: 390Anna Wawrocka, Maciej Krawczyńs
- Page 78 and 79: 392Anna Wawrocka, Maciej Krawczyńs
- Page 80 and 81: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 394-3
- Page 82 and 83: Ewa Zeyland-Malawka, Elżbieta Prę
- Page 84 and 85: Ewa Zeyland-Malawka, Elżbieta Prę
- Page 86 and 87: 400Aleksandra Kuligowska, Grażyna
- Page 88 and 89: 402Aleksandra Kuligowska, Grażyna
- Page 90 and 91: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 404-4
- Page 92 and 93: Dominik Dytfeld i inni 406skopii (M
- Page 94 and 95: 408Marcin Wieczorek i inniratykę p
- Page 96 and 97: 410Marcin Wieczorek i inniTab. 1. S
- Page 98 and 99: 412Marcin Wieczorek i inniSchisandr
- Page 101 and 102: Nowiny Lekarskie 2006, 75, 4, 407-4
- Page 103 and 104: INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORSGeneral1. No