27.02.2013 Views

EPA Review Annex Documents - DFID

EPA Review Annex Documents - DFID

EPA Review Annex Documents - DFID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to be seen. The Ethiopia case study conducted in this report draws conclusion that ’the ESA<br />

region has become much more disintegrated since the <strong>EPA</strong> process started. The divisive<br />

nature of the <strong>EPA</strong> process to date suggests that the prospects of integration process after<br />

the <strong>EPA</strong> may be difficult or worse. It is not easy to come to consensus when negotiating as a<br />

large group especially with vast and varying interests’.<br />

Southern Africa <strong>EPA</strong> group:<br />

Southern African <strong>EPA</strong> group consists of some members of SADC and all members of SACU.<br />

SADC, Southern African Development Community has 13 members including Angola,<br />

Botswana, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique,<br />

Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. SADC has pursued<br />

different approach to regional integration relative to COMESA. It focused on relaxing the<br />

supply side constraints to trade through regional cooperation in various sectors, such as<br />

infrastructure, agriculture, transportation and human resources. In 2000, it launched a FTA<br />

and 11 members opted for participating in a free trade area (Angola and Democratic<br />

Republic of Congo not in FTA). Member countries agreed to liberalise 85% of intra-SADC<br />

trade by 2008 and liberalise sensitive products by 2012. SADC, a free trade area came into<br />

effect on January 2008. 153<br />

There is concern that SADC tariff reductions have been back-loaded and slow. Another<br />

issue is that over time the rules of origin have become restrictive and more product specific<br />

under pressure from member states. The complicated and restrictive rules of origin are<br />

increasing costs of administration and make it difficult for exporter to take advantages of<br />

SADC preferences. Interestingly, there is an attempt to improve polarisation effects on LDC<br />

members of SADC through non-reciprocal market access in sugar and more relaxed rules of<br />

origin in textiles. The agreement also includes provisions for protection of infant industries<br />

and anti-dumping and safeguard measures and agreement calls for elimination of NTBs and<br />

services liberalisation, but on neither front has there been much progress. There is no<br />

institutional mechanism for reporting NTBs or resolution of disputes. Implementation of the<br />

protocol in terms of meeting liberalisation commitments on merchandise trade has been<br />

uneven with many countries like Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe lagging behind. Active<br />

areas of cooperation where there has been progress include training and capacity building in<br />

central banks, development and harmonisation of payments, clearing and settlement<br />

systems. However, there is still concern that SADC is more of a political block than a true<br />

instrument for regional economic integration (Yang and Gupta, 2005).<br />

In March 2004, SADC announced the plan of establishment of a SADC customs union and<br />

implementing a common external tariff by 2010; a common market by 2012, and<br />

establishment of a SADC central bank and preparation for a single SADC currency in<br />

2016. 154 The structure of the SADC customs union mirrors that of SACU – South Africa<br />

Customs Union including Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa and Swaziland. An<br />

important feature of SACU is revenue sharing arrangement. SACU tariff structure is<br />

complex, consisting of ad valorem, specific, mixed, compound, formula duties based on<br />

reference prices and other duties and charges. The ad valorem duties cover around threefourths<br />

of tariff lines and compromise 39 bands ranging between 0% and 55% (Edwards and<br />

Lawrence, 2008). The specific, mixed, compound and formula duties and other charges<br />

cover an important set of agricultural and agro-industrial products and apparel. While SACU<br />

has harmonised applied tariffs, exercise duties, custom valuation, rules of origin and<br />

contingent trade remedies, not much else has been harmonised.<br />

153<br />

SADC wanted to conclude the <strong>EPA</strong> before the establishment of CET, however, the EU preferred to<br />

have CET first.<br />

154<br />

Like many other grand plans of regional integration in Africa, it remains to be seen whether this is<br />

going to implemented, functional and effective.<br />

220

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!