28.02.2013 Views

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

280 Part B Physical and Nonlinear <strong>Acoustics</strong><br />

Part B 8.10<br />

dispersion relation (8.162) is first considered:<br />

ω = Ck + iα1k 2 − α2k 3 , (8.163)<br />

where<br />

1 1<br />

=<br />

C2 C2 l<br />

+ 1<br />

C2 , α1 =<br />

b<br />

δeffC4 ω2 bC2 , α2 =<br />

b<br />

C5<br />

2C2 bω2 .<br />

b<br />

(8.164)<br />

Noting that<br />

ω =−i ∂ ∂<br />

, k = i , (8.165)<br />

∂t ∂x<br />

(8.163) can be treated as the Fourier-space equivalent of<br />

an opera<strong>to</strong>r equation which when operating on ˜p, yields<br />

∂ ˜p ∂ ˜p ∂<br />

+ C − α1<br />

∂t ∂x 2 ˜p ∂<br />

+ α2<br />

∂x2 3 ˜p<br />

= 0 . (8.166)<br />

∂x3 Equation (8.166) should be corrected <strong>to</strong> account for<br />

weak nonlinearity. A systematic derivation is normally<br />

based on the multiple-scales technique [8.101]. Here we<br />

show how this derivation can be done less rigorously,<br />

but more simply. We assume that the nonlinearity in<br />

bubbly liquids comes only from bubble dynamics. Then<br />

(8.155) for weakly nonlinear bubble oscillations has an<br />

additional nonlinear term and becomes:<br />

Π (p ~ )<br />

0<br />

˜p =−B1 ˜R + B2 ˜R 2 − 4µeff<br />

R0<br />

∂ ˜R<br />

∂t − ρl0<br />

∂<br />

R0<br />

2 ˜R<br />

.<br />

∂t2 2W<br />

α 0<br />

A<br />

B<br />

3W<br />

α 0<br />

(8.167)<br />

Fig. 8.15 The potential well used <strong>to</strong> illustrate the “soli<strong>to</strong>n”<br />

solution for the KdV equation<br />

p ~<br />

�<br />

B1 = p0 + 2σ<br />

�<br />

3κ<br />

R0 R0<br />

�<br />

B2 = p0 + 2σ<br />

R0<br />

− 2σ<br />

,<br />

R 2 0<br />

� 3κ(3κ + 1)<br />

2R 2 0<br />

− 2σ<br />

R3 . (8.168)<br />

0<br />

Equation (8.167) has <strong>to</strong> be combined with the linear<br />

wave equation (8.159), which in the case of plane waves<br />

can be written:<br />

C −2 ∂<br />

l<br />

2 ˜p<br />

∂t2 − ∂2 ˜p<br />

∂x2 = 4π R2 0n0ρ0 ∂2 ˜R<br />

. (8.169)<br />

∂t2 Taking in<strong>to</strong> account that all the terms except the<br />

first one on the right-hand side of (8.167) are small,<br />

i. e., of the second order of magnitude, one can derive<br />

the following nonlinear wave equation for pressure<br />

perturbations in a bubbly liquid:<br />

C −2 ∂2 ˜p<br />

∂t2 − ∂2 ˜p<br />

∂x2 = 4π R 2 0n0ρ0 ×<br />

�<br />

B2<br />

B 3 1<br />

∂2 ˜p 2<br />

4µeff<br />

+<br />

∂t2 R0 B2 ∂<br />

1<br />

3 ˜p<br />

∂t3 + ρl0 R0<br />

B2 1<br />

∂4 ˜p<br />

∂t4 �<br />

.<br />

(8.170)<br />

Equation (8.170) is derived for plane weakly nonlinear<br />

pressure waves traveling in a bubbly liquid in both<br />

directions. Namely, the left part of this equation contains<br />

a classic wave opera<strong>to</strong>r when applied <strong>to</strong> a pressure perturbation<br />

function describes waves traveling left <strong>to</strong> right<br />

and right <strong>to</strong> left. The right part of this equation contain<br />

terms of second order of smallness and is therefore<br />

responsible for a slight change of these waves. Thus,<br />

(8.170) may be structured as follows:<br />

�<br />

��<br />

�<br />

−1 ∂ ∂ −1 ∂ ∂<br />

�<br />

C + C − ˜p = O ε<br />

∂t ∂x ∂t ∂x<br />

2�<br />

.<br />

(8.171)<br />

If one considers only waves traveling left <strong>to</strong> right<br />

then<br />

−1 ∂ ∂<br />

C + = O (ε) , (8.172)<br />

∂t ∂x<br />

and we can use the following derivative substitution<br />

(see [8.10])<br />

∂ ∂<br />

≈−C . (8.173)<br />

∂t ∂x<br />

Then, after one time integration over space, and<br />

translation <strong>to</strong> the frame moving left <strong>to</strong> right with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!