28.02.2013 Views

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

high enough that there is little sound power reflected<br />

back down the outlet duct, and the transmission loss of<br />

the silencer (the ratio of the sound power at the outlet<br />

and the sound power at the inlet) is a good measure<br />

of silencer performance. This may not be true at low<br />

frequencies.<br />

Duct silencers are manufactured in a wide variety of<br />

sizes, with linings, with splitters, and with aerodynamic<br />

shapes on the inlet and outlet. Standards are available<br />

for the measurement of silencer performance and guidance<br />

on their use [23.135–139]. The insertion loss of the<br />

silencer is usually measured, and its value may depend<br />

on the direction of air flow relative <strong>to</strong> the direction of<br />

propagation of sound. When the two are in the same<br />

direction (outlet duct), a sound wave is bent <strong>to</strong>ward<br />

the lining whereas when the two are in opposite directions<br />

(inlet duct), sound is bent <strong>to</strong>ward the center of<br />

the duct [23.140].<br />

23.4 Noise and the Receiver<br />

Section 23.2 was devoted <strong>to</strong> the characterization of<br />

sources in terms of their noise emission. The third part of<br />

the source–path–receiver model involves immission of<br />

sound at the receiver. The sound may not be unwanted,<br />

and is therefore not technically noise, but this section<br />

is generally devoted <strong>to</strong> the effects of noise on people.<br />

Section 23.4.5 is devoted <strong>to</strong> sound quality, a subject of<br />

increasing importance in the design of products.<br />

23.4.1 Soundscapes<br />

As discussed in Sect. 23.0.2, a sound field may be described<br />

in terms of a sound pressure, p(r, t), that varies<br />

both in space and time. In practice, it is the RMS pressure<br />

that is measured since the time average of the pressure<br />

itself is zero, and several quantities measured by modern<br />

sound level meters are discussed in Sect. 23.1. The sound<br />

field can be described in the time domain or the frequency<br />

domain, or as a short-time spectrum that varies<br />

with time. Other descriptions are also possible.<br />

The sound field p(r, t) may, for the purposes of this<br />

section, be called a soundscape, an overall acoustical<br />

environment – both indoors and outdoors – that includes<br />

all sound, both wanted and unwanted. The interaction<br />

between an observer and this physical soundscape can<br />

then be described in terms of immission of sound. In<br />

some cases, it has been found that this interaction depends<br />

not only on the properties of the soundscape itself,<br />

Noise 23.4 Noise and the Receiver 999<br />

Calculation of Duct Transmission Loss<br />

Computer programs for the determination of the transmission<br />

loss of ducts are available [23.134]. The<br />

duct lining may consist of air gaps, one or more<br />

layers of porous material, resistive sheets and perforated<br />

facings. As one example, Fig. 23.27 shows<br />

the transmission loss for a duct 2.5 m long having<br />

a cross section of 0.6m × 0.6 m. The sound-absorptive<br />

material has a steel perforated facing 1.6mm thick<br />

with perforations 3 mm in diameter and a 30% open<br />

area. The duct liner is 200 mm thick in one case,<br />

and 100 mm thick in the second. The transmission<br />

loss shown in the figure is from 50 Hz <strong>to</strong> 500 Hz<br />

because the calculation is for plane-wave transmission<br />

only. It can be seen that the peak attenuation<br />

is about the same for both cases, but the thicker<br />

liner provides a much higher transmission loss at low<br />

frequencies.<br />

but on the visual environment of the observer (the landscape).<br />

A discussion of this effect is beyond the scope<br />

of this chapter.<br />

The soundscape includes indoor environments such<br />

as living space and industrial plants, urban and suburban<br />

areas, parks, and wilderness areas. The effects<br />

of the sound field on observers in different portions<br />

of the soundscape are varied, and in many cases difficult<br />

<strong>to</strong> quantify. These effects include hearing damage,<br />

annoyance in various forms – which can range from<br />

mild dissatisfaction <strong>to</strong> frustration and anger – as well as<br />

interference with speech communication in many settings,<br />

including meeting rooms and classrooms. Other<br />

effects include interference with sleep, and loss of productivity.<br />

Since the soundscape includes both wanted<br />

and unwanted sound, the soundscape, when properly<br />

managed can induce a sense of well-being in the observer<br />

which can have a positive effect on the quality<br />

of life. Examples include listing <strong>to</strong> natural sounds in remote<br />

areas where unwanted sound is either nonexistent,<br />

or has been reduced <strong>to</strong> an acceptable level. It is a fact that<br />

“acceptable” means different things <strong>to</strong> different persons.<br />

A further complication is that using conventional<br />

measures of noise immission, the acceptability of<br />

a sound may depend on the source. For example, it<br />

has been found that the same level of noise from aircraft,<br />

road traffic, and rail traffic produces different<br />

human reactions. In recent years, the quality of the<br />

Part G 23.4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!