28.02.2013 Views

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

996 Part G Structural <strong>Acoustics</strong> and Noise<br />

Part G 23.3<br />

will be discussed, methods of measurement of normal<br />

impedance will be presented, and some results of<br />

calculations on composite structures will be shown.<br />

A key parameter is the flow resistance r which can be<br />

defined as the ratio of the pressure drop across a sample<br />

of a material and the velocity through it<br />

r = ∆p<br />

. (23.44)<br />

u<br />

The flow resistance is usually measured for steady flow<br />

through the material, the assumption being made that<br />

this value is equivalent, at least at low frequencies, for<br />

the particle velocity in a sound wave.<br />

The unit of of flow resistance is N s/m3 , the<br />

MKS Rayl. Actual values are often specified as a dimensionless<br />

quantity, the specific flow resistance rs,<br />

where rs = r/ρc = r/406 for a density of air ρ of<br />

1.18 kg/m3 and a speed of sound c of 344 m/s. It is also<br />

common <strong>to</strong> specify the flow resistance per unit thickness.<br />

Another property of sound-absorptive materials is<br />

that they can often considered <strong>to</strong> be locally reacting.<br />

When a sound wave is incident on a locally reacting material,<br />

the local pressure at the surface produces a particle<br />

velocity normal <strong>to</strong> the surface. When the two are sinusoidal<br />

and expressed as complex numbers the ratio is the<br />

normal impedance of the surface<br />

zN = p<br />

. (23.45)<br />

u<br />

The normal impedance is independent of the angle of<br />

incidence of the sound wave.<br />

Two mechanisms are mainly responsible for the absorption<br />

of sound. First, friction in the boundary layer<br />

between the air and the internal structure of the material<br />

absorbs energy, and a large particle velocity is needed<br />

for effective absorption. Second, the temperature rise<br />

during the compression phase of the sound wave results<br />

in conduction of heat in<strong>to</strong> the material, further absorbing<br />

energy from the sound wave. The former is generally<br />

most important.<br />

The sound absorption coefficient α is the ratio of the<br />

sound energy absorbed by the surface and the incident<br />

sound energy. In general, it is a function of the angle of<br />

incidence of the sound wave on the material. It varies<br />

from 0 <strong>to</strong> 1.0, although some measurement methods –<br />

described later in the section – result in values of α>1.<br />

The unit of sound absorption is the metric Sabine, S.<br />

Material with an area of 1 m 2 and α = 1 has 1 Sabine<br />

of sound absorption (10.8 Sabins in English units). The<br />

sound-absorptive properties of, for example, hanging<br />

baffles are frequently expressed in Sabins.<br />

Normal incidence absorption coefficient<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

100<br />

1000<br />

λ/4 3λ/4 5λ/4<br />

10000<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Fig. 23.23 Normal incidence sound absorption coefficient<br />

for a thin, rigid sound absorber having a flow resistance ρc<br />

placed 50 mm from a rigid termination. Calculated using<br />

a program by Ingard [23.125]<br />

Sound absorption coefficients are frequently measured<br />

in octave bands, and the noise reduction coefficient<br />

(NRC) is the average absorption in the 250, 500, 1000,<br />

and 2000 Hz octave bands.<br />

The importance of particle velocity can be illustrated<br />

for the case where a thin sound absorber having a flow<br />

resistance ρc is placed in a tube at a distance 50 mm from<br />

a rigid termination. The normal incidence absorption coefficient<br />

calculated as a function of frequency is shown in<br />

Fig. 23.23. It can be seen that the absorption coefficient<br />

is highest when the distance from the rigid termination is<br />

an odd multiple of one-quarter wavelength of the sound.<br />

It is at these distances that the particle velocity in the<br />

absorber is highest.<br />

Galaitsis [23.126] showed that multiple resistive<br />

sheets can be used <strong>to</strong> improve the sound absorption<br />

at normal incidence, and Ingard [23.125] extended the<br />

analysis <strong>to</strong> diffuse fields for both locally and non-locally<br />

reacting materials. As an example, Fig. 23.24 shows the<br />

absorption coefficients for two resistive sheets having<br />

a flow resistance 1.5 ρc and a <strong>to</strong>tal absorber thickness<br />

of 50 mm. The first sheet is 33 mm from a rigid surface,<br />

and the spacing between the two sheets is 17 mm. The<br />

structure can be made approximately locally reacting by,<br />

for example, using a honeycomb material between the<br />

resistive layers.<br />

Most sound-absorptive materials are relatively thick<br />

(e.g., 25 mm), and in this case, it is beneficial <strong>to</strong> have<br />

an air gap behind the material when it is mounted<br />

near a rigid surface. In the figure below, the sound-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!