28.02.2013 Views

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of the sound fields. Consequently, it is obviously necessary<br />

<strong>to</strong> apply one objective parameter for each of these<br />

subjective aspects.<br />

It is also clear that different listeners will judge the<br />

importance of the various subjective parameters differently.<br />

While some may base their judgment primarily on<br />

loudness or reverberance others may be more concerned<br />

about spaciousness or timbre.<br />

For these reasons, one should be very sceptical when<br />

people attempt <strong>to</strong> rank concert halls along a single, universal,<br />

one-dimensional quality scale or speak about the<br />

best hall in the world. Fortunately, the diversity of room<br />

acoustic design and the complexity of our perception<br />

does not justify such simplifications.<br />

9.3.9 Recommended Values<br />

of Objective Parameters<br />

In view of the remarks above, it may be regarded risky<br />

<strong>to</strong> recommend values for the various objective acoustic<br />

parameters. On the other hand, there is a long tradition<br />

of suggesting optimal values for reverberation time T<br />

as a function of hall volume and type of performance.<br />

Besides, most of the other parameters will seldom deviate<br />

drastically from the expected value determined by<br />

T. As we shall see later, this deviation is primarily influenced<br />

by how we shape the room <strong>to</strong> control early<br />

reflections. Designing for strong early reflections can<br />

increase clarity, sound strength and spaciousness. Current<br />

taste regarding concert hall acoustics for classical<br />

music seems <strong>to</strong> be in favor of high values for these fac<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

in addition <strong>to</strong> strong reverberance. This could lead<br />

<strong>to</strong> suggested ranges for the various parameters in small<br />

and large halls, as shown in Table 9.1. These values relate<br />

<strong>to</strong> empty halls with well-upholstered seating, assuming<br />

<strong>Acoustics</strong> in Halls for Speech and Music 9.3 Subjective and Objective Room Acoustic Parameters 313<br />

that, when fully occupied with musicians and audience,<br />

the T values will drop by no more than say 0.2 s. The reason<br />

for relating the values <strong>to</strong> the unoccupied condition<br />

is that it is seldom possible <strong>to</strong> make acoustic measurements<br />

in the occupied state and almost all reference<br />

data existing regarding parameters other than T are from<br />

unoccupied halls. On the other hand, suggesting wellupholstered<br />

seats is a sound recommendation in most<br />

cases, which will ensure only small changes depending<br />

on the degree of occupancy. This will also justify<br />

extrapolation of the unoccupied values of the other parameters<br />

<strong>to</strong> the occupied condition, as mentioned later<br />

in this section.<br />

The values listed in the table were arrived at by<br />

first choosing values for T ensuring high reverberance,<br />

while the correlative values for EDT, G and C stem<br />

from the diffuse field expected values; but these have<br />

been slightly changed <strong>to</strong> promote high clarity and high<br />

levels. As this is particularly important in larger halls,<br />

it has been suggested <strong>to</strong> use an EDT value 0.1s lower<br />

than T (= EDTexp) andC values 1 dB higher than Cexp<br />

in a 2500 m 3 hall, but 0.2 s less than T and 2 dB higher<br />

than Cexp, respectively, in the 25 000 m 2 hall. Likewise,<br />

it is suggested <strong>to</strong> use G values 2 dB less than Gexp in<br />

the small halls; but only 1 dB less than or even equal <strong>to</strong><br />

Gexp in large halls. For halls of size between the 2500<br />

and 25 000 m 3 listed in the table, one may of course<br />

interpolate <strong>to</strong> taste. Please note that, in general, G is<br />

found <strong>to</strong> be 2–3 dB lower that Gexp (Sect. 9.5.6) sothe<br />

G values suggested here are actually 1–2 dB higher than<br />

those found in “normal” halls.<br />

In the occupied condition, one may expect EDT, C<br />

and G <strong>to</strong> be reduced by amounts equal <strong>to</strong> the difference<br />

between the expected values calculated using T for the<br />

empty and occupied conditions respectively. In any case,<br />

Table 9.1 Suggested position-averaged values of objective room acoustic parameters in unoccupied concert halls for<br />

classical music. It is assumed that the seats are highly absorptive, so that T will be reduced by no more than 0.2swhen<br />

the hall is fully occupied. 2.4 s should be regarded as an upper limit mainly suitable for terraced arena or DRS halls with<br />

large volumes per seat (Sect. 9.7.3), whereas 2.0 s will be more suitable for shoe-box-shaped halls, which are often found<br />

<strong>to</strong> be equally reverberant with lower T values and lower volumes per seat<br />

Parameter Symbol Chamber music Symphony<br />

Hall size V/N 2500 m 3 /300 seats 25 000 m 3 /2000 seats<br />

Reverberation time T 1.5s 2.0–2.4s<br />

Early decay time EDT 1.4s 2.2s<br />

Strength G 10 dB 3dB<br />

Clarity C 3dB −1dB<br />

Lateral energy fraction LEF 0.15–0.20 0.20–0.25<br />

Interaural cross correlation 1 − IACC 0.6 0.7<br />

Early support STearly −10 dB −14 dB<br />

Part C 9.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!