28.02.2013 Views

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mean spectrum level (dB)<br />

–30<br />

–40<br />

–50<br />

–60<br />

–70<br />

–80<br />

–90<br />

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Fig. 16.17 Long-term-average spectra curves obtained from<br />

an untrained male speaker reading the same text at 6<br />

different degrees of vocal loudness. From <strong>to</strong>p <strong>to</strong> bot<strong>to</strong>m<br />

the corresponding Leq values at 0.3 m were 93 dB, 88 dB,<br />

85 dB, 84 dB, 80 dB, and 76 dB<br />

Variation of vocal loudness affects the spectrum<br />

slope as illustrated in Fig. 16.17, which shows longterm-average<br />

spectra (LTAS) from a male untrained<br />

voice. In the figure loudness is specified in terms of the<br />

so-called equivalent sound level Leq. This is a commonly<br />

used time average of sound level, defined as<br />

Leq = 10 log 1<br />

T<br />

�T<br />

0<br />

p 2<br />

p 2 0<br />

dt ,<br />

where t is time and T the size of the time window. p and<br />

p0 are the sound pressure and the reference pressure,<br />

respectively.<br />

When vocal loudness is changed, the higher over<strong>to</strong>nes<br />

change much more in sound level than the lower<br />

over<strong>to</strong>nes. In the figure, a 14 dB change of the level<br />

near 600 Hz is associated with a 22 dB change near<br />

3000 Hz, i. e., about 1.5 times the level change near<br />

600 Hz. Similar relationships have been observed for<br />

professional singers [16.47]. In other words, the slope<br />

of the voice source spectrum decreases with increasing<br />

vocal loudness.<br />

The physiological variable used for variation of vocal<br />

loudness is Ps. This is illustrated in the upper graph<br />

of Fig. 16.18, comparing averaged data observed in untrained<br />

female and male subjects and data obtained from<br />

professional operatic bari<strong>to</strong>ne singers [16.45, 46]. The<br />

relationship between the Ps and MFDR is approximately<br />

linear. It can be observed that the pressure range used<br />

by the singer is considerably wider than that used by the<br />

untrained voices. The MFDR produced with a given Ps<br />

by the untrained female and male subjects is mostly<br />

The Human Voice in Speech and Singing 16.2 The Glottal Sound Source 681<br />

Mean MFDR (l/s 2 )<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

SPL at 0.3m (dB)<br />

Mean Ps (cm H2O)<br />

95<br />

90<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

Untrained females<br />

Untrained men<br />

Bari<strong>to</strong>ne means<br />

196 Hz<br />

139 Hz<br />

278 Hz<br />

300 500 1000<br />

2000<br />

MFDR (l/s 2 )<br />

Fig. 16.18 The <strong>to</strong>p graph shows the relationship between<br />

the mean subglottal pressure and the mean MFDR for<br />

the indicated subject groups. The bot<strong>to</strong>m graph shows the<br />

relationship between MFDR and the SPL at 0.3 m for a professional<br />

bari<strong>to</strong>ne singing the vowels /a/ and /æ/ at different<br />

F0s. (After [16.45] p. 183, [16.46] p. 184)<br />

higher than that produced by the bari<strong>to</strong>nes with the<br />

same pressure.This may depend on different mechanical<br />

characteristics of the vocal folds.<br />

As we will see later, SPL depends on the strength<br />

of the excitation of the vocal tract, i. e. on MFDR. This<br />

variable, in turn, depends on Ps and F0; the higher the<br />

pressure, the greater the MFDR value and the higher the<br />

F0, the greater the MFDR. The <strong>to</strong>p graph of Fig. 16.18<br />

Part E 16.2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!