28.02.2013 Views

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

23.4.4 Criteria for Noise Immission<br />

In this section, criteria are divided in<strong>to</strong> criteria for hearing<br />

damage, criteria for annoyance, and other currently<br />

used criteria.<br />

Hearing Damage Criteria<br />

In the United States, permissible levels for industrial<br />

noise exposure are set by the US Department of Labor,<br />

and are described in 29 CFR 1910.95. In summary, an<br />

employer shall administer a hearing conservation program<br />

when the eight hour time-weighted average level<br />

exceeds 85 dB. The requirements of such a program are<br />

described in detail in the above document – as is the<br />

requirements on audiometers for the determination of<br />

hearing loss, personnel conducting the tests, and hearing<br />

protec<strong>to</strong>rs when used <strong>to</strong> satisfy the requirements below.<br />

More details may be found in the Hearing Conservation<br />

Manual [23.149].<br />

Permissible noise exposures are given in the regulation<br />

in Table G-16, reproduced below (Table 23.9) with<br />

an explanation of how the permissible levels are <strong>to</strong> be<br />

determined.<br />

Currently, engineering controls are required only if<br />

the eight hour noise exposure exceeds 100 dB. For lower<br />

levels, hearing protection is an alternative.<br />

The problem of specifying upper limits for noise<br />

in the workplace has been studied by a technical study<br />

group of the International Institute of Noise Control Engineering,<br />

and a report has been prepared and approved<br />

by the member societies of that organization [23.150].<br />

Most countries in the world allow a time-weighted average<br />

sound level over eight hours of 85–90 dB as the<br />

upper limit, and an exchange rate of 3 dB. Selection<br />

of this exchange rate is widely believed <strong>to</strong> be the best<br />

alternative, and it greatly simplifies the measurement<br />

of levels that fluctuate during the working day. Table<br />

23.10, from [23.150], shows hearing damage criteria<br />

in a number of countries as of 1997.<br />

I-INCE publication 97-1 [23.150] makes specific<br />

recommendations with respect <strong>to</strong> allowable levels, exchange<br />

rate, and hearing conservation programs:<br />

1. It is desirable for jurisdictions without regulations,<br />

or with currently higher limits, <strong>to</strong> set a limit on<br />

the level of exposure over a workshift, A-weighted<br />

and normalized <strong>to</strong> eight hours, of 85 dB as soon as<br />

may be possible given the particular economic and<br />

sociological fac<strong>to</strong>rs that are pertinent.<br />

2. This exposure level should include the contribution<br />

from all sounds that are present including short-term,<br />

Noise 23.4 Noise and the Receiver 1001<br />

high-intensity sounds. If such sounds are further limited<br />

in regulations <strong>to</strong> a maximum sound pressure<br />

level, then regulations should set a limit of 140 dB<br />

for C-weighted peak sound pressure level.<br />

3. An exchange rate of 3 dB per doubling or halving of<br />

exposure time should be used. This exchange rate is<br />

implicit when the exposure level is stated in terms<br />

of eight-hour-average sound pressure level;<br />

4. Efforts should be made <strong>to</strong> reduce levels of noise<br />

in the workplace <strong>to</strong> the lowest economically and<br />

technologically reasonable values, even when there<br />

may be no risk of long-term damage <strong>to</strong> hearing. Such<br />

action can reduce other negative effects of noise such<br />

as reduced productivity, stress and disturbed speech<br />

communication.<br />

5. At the design stage of any new installation, consideration<br />

should be given <strong>to</strong> sound and vibration<br />

isolation between noisier and quieter areas of activity.<br />

Rooms normally occupied by people should have<br />

a significant amount of acoustical absorption in order<br />

<strong>to</strong> reduce the increase of sound due <strong>to</strong> excessive<br />

reverberation.<br />

6. The purchase specifications for all new and replacement<br />

machinery should contain clauses specifying<br />

the maximum emission sound power level and emission<br />

sound pressure level at the opera<strong>to</strong>r’s position<br />

when the machinery is operating.<br />

Table 23.9 Criteria from Table G-16 of 29 CFR 1910.95.<br />

Permissible noise exposures (1)<br />

Duration in hours per day Sound level (dBA)<br />

slow response<br />

8 90<br />

6 92<br />

4 95<br />

3 97<br />

2 100<br />

11/2 102<br />

1 105<br />

1/2 110<br />

1/4 or less 115<br />

Notes:<br />

1. When the daily noise exposure is composed of two or more<br />

periods of noise exposure of different levels, their combined<br />

effect should be considered, rather than the individual effect of<br />

each. If the sum of the following fractions: C1/T1 + C2/T2 +<br />

...Cn/Tn exceeds unity, then, the mixed exposure should be<br />

considered <strong>to</strong> exceed the limit value. Cn indicates the <strong>to</strong>tal time<br />

of exposure at a specified noise level, and Tn indicates the <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

time of exposure permitted at each level. Exposure <strong>to</strong> impulsive<br />

noise should not exceed 140 dB peak sound pressure level<br />

Part G 23.4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!