28.02.2013 Views

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 Part A Propagation of Sound<br />

Part A 3.10<br />

Analysis that makes use of the boundary condition<br />

(3.291) leads <strong>to</strong> the identification<br />

Ê(θI,ω) = ξ(ω)cosθI − 1<br />

ξ(ω)cosθI + 1<br />

for the reflection coefficient, with the abbreviation<br />

(3.296)<br />

ξ(ω) = ZS<br />

, (3.297)<br />

ρc<br />

which represents the ratio of the specific acoustic<br />

impedance of the surface <strong>to</strong> the characteristic impedance<br />

of the medium.<br />

3.10.2 Reflection at an Interface<br />

The above relations also apply, with an appropriate identification<br />

of the quantity ZS, <strong>to</strong> sound reflection [3.65]<br />

at an interface between two fluids with different sound<br />

speeds and densities. Translational symmetry requires<br />

that the disturbance in the second fluid have the same<br />

apparent phase velocity (ω/kx) (trace velocity) along<br />

the x-axis as does the disturbance in the first fluid. This<br />

requirement is known as the trace velocity matching<br />

principle [3.4,30] and leads <strong>to</strong> the observation that kx is<br />

the same in both fluids. One distinguishes two possibilities:<br />

the trace velocity is higher than the sound speed c2<br />

or lower than c2.<br />

For the first possibility, one has the inequality<br />

c2 < c1<br />

, (3.298)<br />

sin θI<br />

and a propagating plane wave (transmitted wave) is<br />

excited in the second fluid, with complex pressure am-<br />

ρI,cI<br />

nI<br />

ρII,cII<br />

θI<br />

y<br />

θII<br />

Fig. 3.19 Reflection of a plane wave at an interface between<br />

two fluids<br />

nII<br />

x<br />

plitude<br />

ˆptrans = Ì(ω, θI) ˆ<br />

f e ikx x e ik2 y cos θII , (3.299)<br />

where k2 = ω/c2 is the wavenumber in the second fluid<br />

and θII (angle of refraction) is the angle at which the<br />

transmitted wave is propagating. The trace velocity<br />

matching principle leads <strong>to</strong> Snell’s law,<br />

sin θI<br />

= sin θII<br />

. (3.300)<br />

c1<br />

c2<br />

The change in propagation direction from θI <strong>to</strong> θII is the<br />

phenomenon of refraction.<br />

The requirement that the pressure be continuous<br />

across the interface yields the relation<br />

1 + Ê = Ì , (3.301)<br />

while the continuity of the normal component of the<br />

fluid velocity yields<br />

cos θI cos θII<br />

(1 − Ê) = Ì . (3.302)<br />

ρ1c1<br />

ρ2c2<br />

From these one derives the reflection coefficient<br />

Ê = ZII − ZI<br />

, (3.303)<br />

ZII + ZI<br />

which involves the two impedances defined by<br />

ZI = ρ1c1<br />

, (3.304)<br />

cos θI<br />

ZII = ρ2c2<br />

. (3.305)<br />

cos θII<br />

The other possibility, which is the opposite of that in<br />

(3.298), can only occur when c2 > c1 and, moreover,<br />

only if θI is greater than the critical angle<br />

θcr = arcsin(c1/c2) . (3.306)<br />

In this circumstance, an inhomogeneous plane wave,<br />

propagating in the x-direction, but dying out exponentially<br />

in the +y-direction, is excited in the second<br />

medium. Instead of (3.299), one has the transmitted<br />

pressure given by<br />

ˆptrans = Ì(ω, θI) fˆ e ikx x −βk2 y<br />

e , (3.307)<br />

with<br />

β =[(c2/c1) 2 sin 2 θI − 1] 1/2 . (3.308)<br />

The previously stated equations governing the reflection<br />

and transmission coefficients are still applicable,<br />

provided one replaces cos θII by iβ. This causes the magnitude<br />

of the reflection coefficient Ê <strong>to</strong> become unity,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!