28.02.2013 Views

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

Introduction to Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

514 Part D Hearing and Signal Processing<br />

Part D 14.6<br />

third moment,<br />

skewness = µ3/µ 3/2<br />

2 . (14.85)<br />

The fourth central moment leads <strong>to</strong> an impression<br />

about how much strength there is in the wings of a probability<br />

density compared <strong>to</strong> the standard deviation. The<br />

14.6 Hilbert Transform and the Envelope<br />

The Hilbert transform of a signal x(t) isH[x(t)] or<br />

function xI(t), where<br />

xI(t) = H[x(t)]= 1<br />

π<br />

�∞<br />

−∞<br />

dt ′ x(t′ )<br />

. (14.87)<br />

t − t ′<br />

Some facts about the Hilbert transform are stated<br />

here without proof. Proofs and further applications may<br />

be found in appendices <strong>to</strong> [14.1].<br />

First, the Hilbert transform is its own inverse, except<br />

for a minus sign,<br />

x(t) = H[xI(t)]=− 1<br />

π<br />

�∞<br />

−∞<br />

dt ′ xI(t ′ )<br />

. (14.88)<br />

t − t ′<br />

Second, a signal and its Hilbert transform are orthogonal<br />

in the sense that<br />

�<br />

dt x(t) xI(t) = 0 . (14.89)<br />

Third, the Hilbert transform of sin(ωt + ϕ) is<br />

− cos(ωt + ϕ), and the Hilbert transform of cos(ωt + ϕ)<br />

is sin(ωt + ϕ).<br />

Further the Hilbert transform is linear. Consequently,<br />

for any function for which a Fourier transform exists,<br />

� �<br />

�<br />

H An cos(ωnt) + Bn sin(ωnt)<br />

or<br />

n<br />

= �<br />

An sin(ωnt) − Bn cos(ωnt) (14.90)<br />

n<br />

� �<br />

�<br />

H Cn sin(ωnt + ϕn)<br />

n<br />

=− �<br />

Cn cos(ωnt + ϕn)<br />

n<br />

= �<br />

Cn sin(ωnt + ϕn − π/2) . (14.91)<br />

n<br />

normalized fourth moment is the kur<strong>to</strong>sis,<br />

kur<strong>to</strong>sis = µ4/µ 2 2 . (14.86)<br />

For instance, the kur<strong>to</strong>sis of a normal density, which has<br />

significant wings, is 3. But the kur<strong>to</strong>sis of a rectangular<br />

density, which is sharply cut off, is only 9/5.<br />

Analytic signal<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

Real x(t)<br />

–0.2<br />

–0.4<br />

–0.6<br />

–0.8<br />

–1<br />

Imaginary xI(t) –100 –50 0 50<br />

100<br />

Time t (ms)<br />

Fig. 14.6 A Gaussian pulse x(t) and its Hilbert transform<br />

xI(t) are the real and imaginary parts of the analytic signal<br />

corresponding <strong>to</strong> the Gaussian pulse<br />

Comparing the two sine functions above makes it clear<br />

why a Hilbert transform is sometimes called a 90-degree<br />

rotation of the signal.<br />

Figure 14.6 shows a Gaussian pulse, x(t), and its<br />

Hilbert transform, xI(t). The Gaussian pulse was made<br />

by adding up 100 cosine harmonics with amplitudes<br />

given by a Gaussian spectrum per (14.35). The Hilbert<br />

transform was computed by using the same amplitude<br />

spectrum and replacing all the cosine functions by sine<br />

functions.<br />

Figure 14.6 illustrates the difficulty often encountered<br />

in computing the Hilbert transform using the time<br />

integrals that define the transform and its inverse. If we<br />

had <strong>to</strong> calculate x(t) by transforming xI(t)using(14.88)<br />

we would be troubled by the fact that xI(t) goes <strong>to</strong> zero<br />

so slowly. An accurate calculation of x(t) would require<br />

a longer time span than that shown in the figure.<br />

14.6.1 The Analytic Signal<br />

The analytic signal ˜x(t)forx(t) is given by the complex<br />

sum of the original signal and an imaginary part equal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!