28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P? is total inlet pressure.<br />

Tc=T? is local mixing cooling layer and main-stream temperatures<br />

ratio.<br />

mc=m? is the coolant to total main-stream mass flows ratio.<br />

a is the angle <strong>of</strong> injection.<br />

The loss in total pressure <strong>of</strong> the main-stream flow due to injection decreases<br />

with decreasing angle <strong>of</strong> injection is directly proportional to the local mainstream<br />

Mach number squared and is strongly influenced by the blowing<br />

rate. When the injection angle decreases, the effect <strong>of</strong> coolant-to-mainstream<br />

temperature ratio Tc=T? becomes less pronounced for highertemperature<br />

ratios and more evident for lower ratios. Limited test data have<br />

shown this loss prediction to be reasonable and consistent with test results.<br />

The important end result <strong>of</strong> this method is that it gives a certain guidance in<br />

the optimum location <strong>of</strong> film cooling holes. It is apparent that film cooling<br />

near the stagnation point and on the pressure surface <strong>of</strong> airfoils (where the<br />

Mach numbers are low) will give small total pressure losses, whereas film<br />

cooling on the suction side near the throat (where Mach numbers are high)<br />

will give high total pressure losses.<br />

It is quite <strong>of</strong>ten argued that the trailing-edge ejection <strong>of</strong> the coolant<br />

flow might reduce the aerodynamic losses by filling in the wake. Several<br />

investigations showed a positive effect <strong>of</strong> cooling discharge into the trailingedge<br />

wake, especially when significant amount <strong>of</strong> high momentum flux<br />

cooling flow had been discharged. However, due to manufacturing and cost<br />

considerations, most <strong>of</strong> the advanced airfoils are designed with air<br />

discharged on the pressure side immediately upstream <strong>of</strong> the trailing edge.<br />

Significant attention over the last few years was paid to the penalties<br />

associated with end-wall film cooling. Some <strong>of</strong> the studies have indicated<br />

that when film is properly introduced upstream <strong>of</strong> the stagnation plane <strong>of</strong><br />

the airfoils, it might control the secondary flow formation such as a<br />

horseshoe vortex initiated at the fillet junction between an airfoil and the<br />

end wall (more details about end-wall cooling and secondary flow control<br />

can be found later in this chapter).<br />

An important role in cooling penalties is also played by the cooling air<br />

that cools turbine discs and buffers disc cavities from hot gas ingress. The<br />

amount and manner <strong>of</strong> discharging this air into the main stream can<br />

significantly affect the performance losses. A recently performed study [11]<br />

indicates that the most beneficial location and direction for discharging the<br />

air from disc cavity is an immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> the vane trailing edges near<br />

the inner end wall at a velocity vector that closely matches the nozzle exit<br />

velocity.<br />

Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!