28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> arrays <strong>of</strong> circular cylinders embedded inside a turbine airfoil cooling<br />

passage such that they are oriented normal to the flow direction. The two<br />

most common arrangements are the in-line and staggered arrays. They are<br />

typically, although not exclusively, employed in narrow channels where the<br />

castability <strong>of</strong> trip-strips (ribs) is in question. The majority <strong>of</strong> data available<br />

on pin fins is for the staggered array geometry, and unless otherwise stated<br />

all correlations are given for this geometry. This is generally the geometry <strong>of</strong><br />

choice for a designer.<br />

The heat transfer in turbine airfoil pin fin banks combines the pin heat<br />

transfer with the pin end-wall heat transfer. Pin fin heat transfer averaged<br />

over the array appears to vary with Reynolds number to a power <strong>of</strong> between<br />

0.6 and 0.7, depending on the pin height. The local heat transfer in rows <strong>of</strong><br />

pin fins increases for the first three to five rows for arrays with nonrestricted<br />

entrances; in-line array heat-transfer exhibits a fully developed behavior<br />

after the third row, while staggered arrays exhibit a peak in the third to fifth<br />

rows, followed by a slight decay in the succeeding downstream rows.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> turbine pin fin applications are to be found in the<br />

trailing-edge region <strong>of</strong> airfoils. Here, aerodynamic considerations demand a<br />

small wedge angle for the trailing edge, and as a result the internal passages<br />

become so narrow that the choice <strong>of</strong> cooling scheme is limited. Pin fins in the<br />

trailing-edge region also serve a structural purpose by holding the suction<br />

and pressure surfaces together. It is not always possible to manufacture pins<br />

<strong>of</strong> optimum length for heat-transfer purposes in the trailing-edge region due<br />

to limits in casting technology, which is not capable <strong>of</strong> reliably producing<br />

pins much smaller than about 0.02 in. in diameter. Typically in this region,<br />

pin fins have height-to-diameter ratios between 4 and 1, or even lower. In<br />

these ‘‘short’’ pin fin arrays, the heat transfer has been shown to be lower<br />

than from longer pin fins. A few studies showed that for height-to-diameter<br />

ratios less than 3, there is no effect <strong>of</strong> the ratio on array averaged heat<br />

transfer. However, for the ratio greater than 3, the heat transfer was found<br />

to increase significantly with length. For short pin fins the cylinder/end-wall<br />

interaction becomes important, and the array total heat transfer must<br />

include heat transfer from both the cylinder surface and the uncovered<br />

region on the end wall. This presents a fundamental difference from arrays<br />

having long cylinders in which the end-wall effects become insignificant.<br />

Also, the addition <strong>of</strong> short pin fin arrays to a cooling passage may actually<br />

cover up more wall surface area than they add in pin surface area. Thus, the<br />

term ‘‘extended surface’’ does not really apply to this configuration.<br />

Therefore, in this situation, the predominant mechanism <strong>of</strong> heat-transfer<br />

augmentation lies in promoting flow turbulence rather than the addition <strong>of</strong><br />

heat-transfer area.<br />

Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!