28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a gear train that has performed satisfactorily in over 2,500 production<br />

units. The experience gained to date in turbomachinery design was also<br />

evident. At approximately 5 1<br />

2 hp per pound <strong>of</strong> weight, the Thor engine<br />

turbopump more than doubled the specific power <strong>of</strong> its Redstone predecessor.<br />

During the mid- and late 1950s, this geared turbopump arrangement<br />

was a common design selection used by several aerospace companies.<br />

Several distinct variations emerged. Among these were<br />

A common pump drive where a single gear train linked the turbine to<br />

both pumps. This arrangement was used where both pumps could operate at<br />

the same angular velocity.<br />

Independent gear drives where each pump was geared separately to the<br />

turbine. This arrangement allowed each pump to run at a different angular<br />

velocity. This could be necessary for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons, such as a large<br />

density difference between propellants.<br />

Turbine direct drive to one propellant pump, with a gear train to the<br />

other propellant pump. This arrangement was particularly applicable to an<br />

engine that had a large difference in the power requirements for the two<br />

pumps. It has the potential to avoid large reductions in turbopump system<br />

efficiency caused by a low-power design for a separate turbine for the lowpower<br />

pump.<br />

It should be pointed out that the original necessity for gear drive <strong>of</strong> a<br />

turbopump was the inability <strong>of</strong> the centrifugal pumps to operate at the same<br />

angular velocity as the turbine. This was due to a number <strong>of</strong> factors, all<br />

based on fundamental technology that did not exist in the 1950s. The U.S.<br />

government and industry have invested considerable effort in research since<br />

that time. As a result, the obstacles that made gear drives necessary are now<br />

largely absent. For this reason, a ‘‘common shaft’’ arrangement with both<br />

pump(s) and turbine on the same shaft is now essentially a standard. This<br />

configuration obviously benefits in both weight and bulk from the absence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the gearbox and the internal gear train.<br />

In the late 1950s, the U.S. government perceived the need to develop a<br />

very high thrust single-chamber rocket engine. This perception was based on<br />

understanding (and speculation) <strong>of</strong> the propulsion capability <strong>of</strong> the Soviet<br />

Union at the time. The engine was to produce 1.5 million lb <strong>of</strong> thrust<br />

burning liquid oxygen and kerosene propellants. This engine was the F-1. A<br />

cluster <strong>of</strong> five such engines provided the first-stage muscle for the Saturn V<br />

launch vehicle and until the late 1980s was the most powerful operational<br />

rocket engine in the world. To support the engine thrust level <strong>of</strong> over<br />

750 tons, enormous quantities <strong>of</strong> propellants had to be moved from the<br />

vehicle tanks to the thrust chamber. With the combustion chamber pressure<br />

set at approximately 1,000 psi, 2 tons <strong>of</strong> liquid oxygen per second had to be<br />

Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!