28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

lade speed at the reduced shaft speed, it is necessary to increase the turbine<br />

diameter, which causes the blade height to decrease. The short blades cause<br />

an increase in secondary flow losses reducing turbine efficiency. With partial<br />

admission, the blade height can be increased, reducing secondary flow<br />

losses. In a low-flow-rate situation, maintaining a given hub-to-tip radius<br />

ratio results in an increase in the design shaft speed and a decrease in the<br />

overall size <strong>of</strong> the turbine. However, manufacturing limits restrict the radial<br />

tip clearance and blade thickness. With a small blade height, tip clearance<br />

losses are increased. With a limitation on how thin blades can be made, it is<br />

necessary to reduce blade count in order to keep trailing-edge blockage to a<br />

reasonable level. Fewer blades result in longer blade chord and reduced<br />

aspect ratio, leading to higher secondary flow losses. The taller blades<br />

associated with partial admission can increase turbine performance. For<br />

high-head applications a high blade speed is necessary for peak efficiency.<br />

With shaft speed restricted by bearing and manufacturing limitations, an<br />

increase in turbine diameter is required, resulting in a situation similar to the<br />

no-gearbox case discussed earlier. Here, too, partial admission can result in<br />

improved turbine efficiency.<br />

The penalty for partial admission is two additional losses not found in<br />

full-admission turbines. These are the pumping loss and sector loss. The<br />

pumping loss accounts for the drag <strong>of</strong> the rotor blades as they pass through<br />

the inactive arc, the portion <strong>of</strong> the circumference not supplied with flow<br />

from the stator. The sector loss arises from the decrease in momentum<br />

caused by the mixing <strong>of</strong> the stator exit flow with the relatively stagnant fluid<br />

occupying the blade passage just as it enters the active arc. Instead <strong>of</strong> being<br />

converted into useful shaft work, the stator exit flow is used to accelerate<br />

this stagnant fluid up to the rotor exit velocity. An additional loss occurs at<br />

the other end <strong>of</strong> the active arc as the blade passages leave the active zone.<br />

Just as a blade passage is at the edge <strong>of</strong> the last active stator vane passage,<br />

the flow into the rotor blade passage is reduced. This reduced flow has the<br />

entire blade passage to expand into. The sudden expansion causes a loss in<br />

momentum resulting in decreased power output from the turbine. Loss<br />

models for partial-admission effects are not as well developed as those for<br />

conventional, full-admission turbines. As a historical basis, Glassman [1]<br />

presents Stodola’s [20] pumping loss model and Stenning’s [21] sector loss<br />

model in an understandable form and discusses their use. More recently,<br />

Macchi and Lozza [22] have compiled a number <strong>of</strong> more modern loss<br />

models and exercised them during the design <strong>of</strong> partial-admission turbines.<br />

The reader is referred to those sources for detailed information regarding<br />

the estimation <strong>of</strong> partial-admission losses.<br />

Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!